WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

776

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Makes sense.

When i was 13 I read Jolly Rogers anarchist cookbook. Which apparently gets you on some sort of list now.

At any rate. Gasoline and styrofoam is said to create a sticky flamable poor-mans napalm.

I tried to convince my dad to make it but he wasn't having it.

Later that year another kid got suspended 2 weeks for printing the text file on his dot matrix and bringing it go school.

Good times

[–] 2 pts

Gasoline and styrofoam is said to create a sticky flamable poor-mans napalm.

It sure does. You'd be surprised how much Styrofoam will dissolve into a gallon of gas.

[–] 0 pt

Last time I tried it the Styrofoam wouldnt dissolve. I assumed they started using different materials to make it.

[–] 1 pt

Gotta use those old S shaped foam pieces, whatever kind that is. Lest that's what I remember back from when I liked to burn things. It's some nasty shit, I would suggest trying to make it in an open field and wearing gloves.

[–] 1 pt

Some Styrofoam isn't real Styrofoam, that stuff is made from corn starch because its biodegradable.

The easy to way tell the difference is that the corn starch packing peanuts look like little noodles and will dissolve in water.

[–] 0 pt

Exactly what I came here to say. Better fuel? That's napalm.

[–] 1 pt

The more I look at the green movement, the more I see it as an attempt to set the stage for multiple large scale resource wars.

[–] 0 pt

I'm pretty much in agreement with you. Even Green Peace has acknowledged that we need Nuclear Power because its the least polluting mass energy source.

[–] 1 pt

a decent alternative while we await long-haul electric vehicles.

Electric vehicles are not the answer, it is an agenda.

  1. There isn't enough lithium to produce the necessary batteries.
  2. The electric grid is already old and needs replacing. There isn't enough capacity to meet future demand.
  3. Generating electricity isn't as green as the media lies about
[–] 1 pt

They're not the answer to what? They're cheaper to operate per mile than gasoline. That's all I care about. I'm sure they won't be once the jews figure that out, but for now I enjoy the 3-4 cents per mile fuel cost.

[–] 2 pts

They're cheaper to operate per mile than gasoline.

Only after you purchase the vehicle. This doesn't take into consideration, replacement battery packs. It also doesn't take into consideration the time it takes to charge the batteries. You're limited to the range of a charge and must carefully plan your route so you can make it to a charge station. And then, if there's a queue...

[–] 2 pts

My current vehicle cost $18,500 after tax credits.

The battery packs are warranted did 150,000 miles, but even if they died at 150,001 miles it would prorate to about 5 cents per mile.

They're is no "time charging" because it charges while I sleep. I don't drive over 200 miles in a day so I don't need to recharge other times.

[–] 2 pts

doesnt care about the billions of tons of dirt to move to find a few ounces of lithium.. using fossil fuels

[–] 1 pt

I can agree that EVs are not the future that everyone thinks they are. I'm in the diesel is the future because of its varying options.

Some of your points are moot. Vehicle cost happens either way because you need a vehicle.

People who buy EVs often end up installing a home charging unit or at least installing a higher capacity outlet to plug into. A lot of places here in the US have been installing Pay Charging stations because of the tax credits for them. I'll put this on the potential buyer to know the charging station infrastructure in their region before they buy an EV.


My current house is a corner lot, if I was going to stay here another twenty plus years I'd install a pay charging station on the side yard and optn it to the public.

Explain your definition of green

[–] 1 pt

I have no fucking clue. Green is fluid, just like gender. It means whatever the jews want it to mean to win their argument at the time.