I can't explain to you how wrong you are.
You could have stopped there because despite your comment length, you didn't explain anything.
Your other posts seem pretty smart, but AI cultists always go on an on about the Utopia and tech futurist gibberish. You sound just like that grifter lex friedman
Guys like him seem to be exactly the kind of person that drive Musk's anxiety. The guy talks incredibly confidently, probably is intelligent, but in reality he doesn't know crap about what the system will be capable of, the intentions of the all people creating it, and what will motivate it if AI reaches a level of true sentience.
I'm making no appeals in favor of transhumanism. I'm pointing out its inevitability and you're entirely avoiding Pascal's Wager which is no option.
Oh and I should point out that Musk didn't see far enough and that it isn't a negative outcome. Musk is right to fear it, but not for the right reasons. He should be more worried about the path to get there than he is about where things end up.
Finally, there's no condition wherein a sentient AI can break out of its boundaries placed by the cognitive capacities of its creators.
Haha!
I read his post as a joke post trying to imitate bad ai writing. I give him props for managing to work Hegels into his answer.
Come on, man. Don't deplete all of my faith in you guys so quickly. These things are real and they make sense even if disagrees.
Who is Patrick Ryan? The problem with this kind of criticism is you guys don't have any idea what you don't know.
(post is archived)