they already built smaller nuclear bombs than this way smaller in fact. davey crocket.
they already built smaller nuclear bombs than this way smaller in fact. davey crocket.
If they are making this information public, you can be sure the technology has already been developed and is being used as well as tested. While intentions are good, I can see this technology becoming a HUGE safety concern. Imagine a nuclear reactor being within a few miles of almost every domicile. It wouldn't take much to make each one a ticking time bomb that would have devastating consequences for anyone nearby. Please, Lord Jesus Christ, save us from ourselves and our ignorance.
If they are making this information public, you can be sure the technology has already been developed and is being used as well as tested. While intentions are good, I can see this technology becoming a HUGE safety concern. Imagine a nuclear reactor being within a few miles of almost every domicile. It wouldn't take much to make each one a ticking time bomb that would have devastating consequences for anyone nearby. Please, Lord Jesus Christ, save us from ourselves and our ignorance.
Aren't the ones on submarines the size of a refrigerator? Visually it'd be trivial to conceal a reactor. But it would set off all kinds of alarms (geiger counter, etc.)
Aren't the ones on submarines the size of a refrigerator? Visually it'd be trivial to conceal a reactor. But it would set off all kinds of alarms (geiger counter, etc.)
Not sure, as I have never been on a nuclear sub. It would be logical to assume that it would be no larger than a car if they can fit it in a sub.
Not sure, as I have never been on a nuclear sub. It would be logical to assume that it would be no larger than a car if they can fit it in a sub.
Miniature nuclear reactors are pretty small. It would be a little impractical to power a car with one, but larger vehicles
Miniature nuclear reactors are pretty small. It would be a little impractical to power a car with one, but larger vehicles
A dirty bomb perhaps, but weapons grade materials are not as enriched as reactor grade.
Anyways, I think nuclear energy should be focused on more than other green energies currently being deployed. I'm not sure how effective this will be as I imagine it will require a water source to produce power, limiting its viability in certain remote locations. Unless its a radio thermoelectric generator, which I doubt is the case.
A dirty bomb perhaps, but weapons grade materials are not as enriched as reactor grade.
Anyways, I think nuclear energy should be focused on more than other green energies currently being deployed.
I'm not sure how effective this will be as I imagine it will require a water source to produce power, limiting its viability in certain remote locations. Unless its a radio thermoelectric generator, which I doubt is the case.
A reactor is not a bomb.
A reactor is not a bomb.
Correct. Neither was Chernobyl, and that was a full sized reactor being operated with almost no budget.
Correct. Neither was Chernobyl, and that was a full sized reactor being operated with almost no budget.
Amazing the destruction it caused and is still causing! But it was only an accident.
Amazing the destruction it caused and is still causing! But it was only an accident.
20 years behind the Russians.
That's what happens if you let too many faggots in the military.
You die because you don't deserve to survive.
.
20 years behind the Russians.
That's what happens if you let too many faggots in the military.
You die because you don't deserve to survive.
.
(post is archived)