I think you're wrong. Any stratification in the pricing model will most likely be for businesses and governments looking to selectively avoid certain countries or data centres/hubs.
I bought it to stream and run security cameras at the cabin. I currently pay 75$/month for cell phone based internet which gives me 100 gigs at 3.5 Mbps. Starlink is a much better deal.
YOU MISREAD EVERY WORD I WROTE!!!
How the fuck am I wrong ?!!?!?!!?!?!
I wrote IN FOUR YEARS the price jumps.
How the fuck am I wrong?
It will jump to what the market can bear for people with zero alternative options.
Tell me why it's exactly four years, why not two, three, five, or ten?
All prices rise. Yes the price will be more in four years than it is today. Good job man!
I think you should look at the orbits of the satellites maybe then you'll get a clue as to why position based pricing doesn't make sense.
Whoosh.
YOU STILL DID NOT READ my post.
The tactic is simple and a famous Harvard Business School tactic.
4 years is optimal for max/min of a bait and switch service model.
YOU DID NOT READ, and I am not wrong.
(post is archived)