I don't need a right-wing encyclopedia to reaffirm my beliefs, why can't there just be factual medium that comes from a neutral point of view?
Facts not feelings is what we need.
I think that would be nice too. But we need to rethink what we’ve been calling “neutral” for the last 80 years or so.
But we need to rethink what we’ve been calling “neutral” for the last 80 years or so.
There should be no political inflection one way or the other in stating facts. If we have to put a spin on everything like the pinkos do then we lose the moral high ground. We only have to highlight socialist and communist atrocities, not grandstand our brand.
Quite honestly no one that isn't already right-leaning is ever going to visit Conservapedia. Conservatism is a brand just like Nazism is a brand. It's the biggest obstacle to making the product palatable to the masses.
(post is archived)