WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

506

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

Larry Sanger? What kind of name is Sanger (archive.is)?

Every god damned time.

[–] 5 pts

Actually he was raised Lutheran, became agnostic and defends Christianity. (larrysanger.org)

[–] 5 pts

If someone is born jewish, you can safely assume anything good about him is a lie. Though jews are like vampires when it comes to christianity, i dont think you will ever hear a jew defend christians so maybe hes not that bad

[–] 1 pt

there's so many jews that have infiltrated christianity over the years to cuck it over. why is this so hard to believe jews will put on the cloth for our detriment? the soros open society foundation memo leaked revealed that soros had his people in every major christian evangelist in the country ready to do his globalist agenda.. and have been doing it for years of course. so no.. don't ever trust the jew.

[–] 3 pts

I hope this is true. I'm becoming ultra-paranoid in the current political climate.

[–] 5 pts

You need to relax every once in a while. Take some stress off. Send me your nudes

[–] 2 pts

I hope to god you are right

[–] 0 pt

What kind of name is Sanger?

Anglo saxon, means "singer" (houseofnames.com)

Your link is broken, what was it?

[–] 0 pt

It was an archive of an ancestry .com page. German jews use Sanger too. Fuckin' shape shifters.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, it's really hard to know.

I do notice something of a pattern though:

Demonyms: Usually named after cities (berg, stein etc.). Rarely rural areas. By contrast, native German, English and French demonyms are more likely to be rural.

Professions: Usually working high value materials like silver or gold, or some kind of service profession.

Jewish caste system: Colour names (schwartz, weiß, gelb etc.) are almost always jewish. They refer to some kind of social stratification system, but I've never been clear on exactly how it works.

Made up names: When they invent names they're usually named after something luxurious are pretty, such as "Gold," "Crystal," "Roses," etc.

Transliterations: They often (poorly) translate their name into the local language when they move country. So "Rosenfeld" becomes "Roosevelt" and "Goldschmitt" becomes "Goldsmith" or "Golden" etc.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts (edited )

I see a bid to control the oppositions narrative. Doomed from the start.

[–] 1 pt

He sees the problem as the site being too democratic and experts not having enough of a stranglehold. Problem is, most of the "experts" these days are lefty jews, so anything he replaces it with will have the same problem.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

Yeah. He claims he isn't jewish but then goes on to deny simple facts about jews or even wikipedia itself. For example one jew writes 75% of the content for Wikipedia. He's controlled opposition. Only exists to distract people noticing things from the root of the problem.

https://larrysanger.org/2011/01/nope-i-am-not-a-jew-nttawwt/

Obvious cointelpro crypto operative.

[–] 1 pt

That was my first reaction too, no doubt this is another big tech controlled op project.

[–] 0 pt

It's also doomed if they follow kikepedia's example and allow secondary sources. Secondary sources is just a fancy way of saying the fake news.

[–] 5 pts

Isn't that EXACTLY how Wikipedia started?

Unless he locks administration down to people he trusts, it'll just get jooed again. Even then, it'll probably still get jooed.

[–] 0 pt

Wikipedia was started because the "experts only" encyclopedia he was working on was growing too slowly. He wants to create another experts only version, which will probably end up even more kiked than wikipedia.

[–] 2 pts
[–] 0 pt

I don't need a right-wing encyclopedia to reaffirm my beliefs, why can't there just be factual medium that comes from a neutral point of view?

Facts not feelings is what we need.

[–] 0 pt

I think that would be nice too. But we need to rethink what we’ve been calling “neutral” for the last 80 years or so.

[–] 0 pt

But we need to rethink what we’ve been calling “neutral” for the last 80 years or so.

There should be no political inflection one way or the other in stating facts. If we have to put a spin on everything like the pinkos do then we lose the moral high ground. We only have to highlight socialist and communist atrocities, not grandstand our brand.

Quite honestly no one that isn't already right-leaning is ever going to visit Conservapedia. Conservatism is a brand just like Nazism is a brand. It's the biggest obstacle to making the product palatable to the masses.

[–] 1 pt

Will it include an "early life" section for people?

[–] 1 pt

That is a most excellent question.

not using infogalactic

not using metapedia

[–] 1 pt

Wikipedia got taken over because it was up for grabs. So many people stopped using it for a source the left basically picked up a corpse to put on strings.

[–] 1 pt

I don't agree that's accurate. Jimbo Wales is a lefty jew and ensured it's initial population had a heavy leftists bias from the start. He also promoted schemes to have students in lefty indoctrination courses add propaganda to the site in exchange for college credit.

[–] 1 pt

Even in 2007 when I was still in high school, teachers wouldn't allow Wikipedia as a source because it was being used as propaganda.

True. Nobody should use a centralised source to find their information. It's really risky. There are advantages of using Wikipedia, but using Wikipedia for whatever reasons fuels them to continue their propaganda, therefore it's really not worth to use it at all. It's like saying Socialism promotes free health care so let's embrace it. It's true free health care is nice, but socialism has other harmful policies that make it not worth overall. I had blocked Wikipedia from Google with an extension. Now I hardly miss it.

[–] 1 pt

We've known for a while that Wikipedia had gone over to the dark side but it's good hear it from the horses mouth so to speak.

[–] 1 pt

He's been saying it for years.

[–] 0 pt

Infogalactic already exists and is run by the very based Vox Day.

[–] 0 pt

Cool a free speech wiki, let me just go ahead and name the jew....... and im banned.

[–] 0 pt

Cofounder?

Is the the Jewish one? I thought the founder was jewish?

Don't tell me. The real programmer and founder was a European with hi IQ who actually wrote the code and the Jew ended up controlling it. Am I right?

Or is this cofounder just another Jew to start another managed opposition site because everyone now realizes Wikipedia is Jewish controlled crap.

Load more (5 replies)