You are correct, but Prior Art is an issue for the courts, and usually takes a fuckton of money and even then, with the kiked judiciary, nothing is certain.
The patent rush from 2000 to 2010 or so was to add "on a computer" on everything.
Patent for how to organize files "on a computer" - granted, even though decades of actual filing organization set the stage for how to set up the computers.
Patent for renaming a file "on a computer" etc
It is always much easier to be the first to file now, and deal with any prior art cases after getting the patent. Losing a patent to prior art is way cheaper than losing to another company and then fighting with a court to accept that prior art exists.
You are correct, but Prior Art is an issue for the courts, and usually takes a fuckton of money and even then, with the kiked judiciary, nothing is certain.
The patent rush from 2000 to 2010 or so was to add "on a computer" on everything.
Patent for how to organize files "on a computer" - granted, even though decades of actual filing organization set the stage for how to set up the computers.
Patent for renaming a file "on a computer" etc
It is always much easier to be the first to file now, and deal with any prior art cases after getting the patent. Losing a patent to prior art is way cheaper than losing to another company and then fighting with a court to accept that prior art exists.
(post is archived)