Edit; No something is not a 'crime' until its occurred in the eyes of the public, you need to go back to class.
yes...that's how the law works you fucking moron
If i sit outside a store and think about robbing it, it's not a crime, if i walk in with a gun in my pocket with the intent to rob said store i still haven't committed said crime, only until i pull the gun out and threaten to use force unless given money is a crime committed
If you want to get into conspiracy charges and the like, then you have to have factual proof of said collusion and intent as well as the means to do so, A nobody can be found "planning" to steal the election but if they have no means to do so they can't be charged even if they have the intent
don't reply, clearly you can't keep up
You dumb smuck, go read the introduction to the criminal code ... There are conducts of behaviour that someone '...has to or is about to commit an unlawful act' for reasonable suspicion that said conduct constitutes an illegal/ unlawful criminal act. Not whether it's done in public or not, you're confusing ' criminal code infractions committed in front of third party witnesses (public view)', which is entirely separate you complete mong. According to you, things like tax fraud, money laundering, white collar crime, embezzlement etc etc aren't criminal acts or crimes cause you would have to commit it in public view first or there to be a witness. Gee i know, just commit crime at night , while no-one is around, better yet - knock off any witnesses. No, its the act thats criminal, not whether people see it or not is, jeez are you 5 ??? wahahaaaa ....
i'm not talking about the actual court though i'm talking about the court of public opinion as well
jan 20th, that was the date that had to pass, the crime is the swearing in of an illegitimate government, now, if the military has proof of it, they are duty bound to arrest said government and install a new civilian government.
Had trump simply declared marshal law and tried to do it it would have failed, framed as a "coup attempt" done by trump, now trump is out of office, and is no longer the CiC.
You really don't understand what i'm talking about, that's ok, you'll find out soon enough.
Court of public opinion ???. There are just as many people virulently opposed to what you're suggesting and in fact according to them 'all trump supporters should be rounded up' , do you think the military should listen to that 'public opinion' ??.
Public opinion has absolutely no legal standing in determining what US military does or doesnt do. It has to follow legal chain of command . Not bc outspoken tards in thee msm/ public all want them to bomb 'muh russia' First you say he 'cant call them in', but when i point out trump authorized the EO 2018, you then say 'oh no i mean other people are saying that stuff... '.
Stop moving the goal posts and be consistent with your argument, either trump did authorise the EO (giving direction to the military) or the military are acting without their commander in chief. It's very simple as i pointed out , but you seem caught up in bs pr crap that has no actual substance, just stop it.
No, you're conflating ideas and words and when called out it, you change what you say you mean or say i don't understand it. Likewise i keep saying and you keep ignoring, either trump authorised the military to take action through via the EO or he didn't and then the military is acting outside of their chain of command (here i can allow the 'according to the constitution' argument for them acting - although one can rightfully argue that has been successfully nullified decades ago in law, by acts of congress when making the UNITED STATES a corporation - buts that's another topic entirely).
(post is archived)