i'm not talking about the actual court though i'm talking about the court of public opinion as well
jan 20th, that was the date that had to pass, the crime is the swearing in of an illegitimate government, now, if the military has proof of it, they are duty bound to arrest said government and install a new civilian government.
Had trump simply declared marshal law and tried to do it it would have failed, framed as a "coup attempt" done by trump, now trump is out of office, and is no longer the CiC.
You really don't understand what i'm talking about, that's ok, you'll find out soon enough.
Court of public opinion ???. There are just as many people virulently opposed to what you're suggesting and in fact according to them 'all trump supporters should be rounded up' , do you think the military should listen to that 'public opinion' ??.
Public opinion has absolutely no legal standing in determining what US military does or doesnt do. It has to follow legal chain of command . Not bc outspoken tards in thee msm/ public all want them to bomb 'muh russia' First you say he 'cant call them in', but when i point out trump authorized the EO 2018, you then say 'oh no i mean other people are saying that stuff... '.
Stop moving the goal posts and be consistent with your argument, either trump did authorise the EO (giving direction to the military) or the military are acting without their commander in chief. It's very simple as i pointed out , but you seem caught up in bs pr crap that has no actual substance, just stop it.
Court of public opinion ???. There are just as many people virulently opposed to what you're suggesting and in fact according to them 'all trump supporters should be rounded up' , do you think the military should listen to that 'public opinion' ??.
It can be shifted, listen son...stop with the rhetorical questions and nonsense lines of inquiry...you clearly have never served and have no idea how military operates...this is my last comm heading out for the next 2 days. Save this for later, come back to it :)
'...stop with the rhetorical questions and nonsense lines of inquiry' I'm gonna reply again to you're idiotic postings, social media is literally awash with groups willing to identify trump supporters to 'punish and correct their behaviours'. Multiple Politicians have also voice opinions and are also supporting and advocating for a national program to identify the same supporters .... and you're answer is to ignore it and just brush me off ... simply pathetic.
You're the one mixing and conflating 'legal procedure with muh optics (of what people/ agencies/ intitutions SHOULD do), or it's that you're not able to articulate what you actually mean, cause you keep changing the definition of what you're saying, so nah fck you... telling me iv'e never served what a clown.
No, you're conflating ideas and words and when called out it, you change what you say you mean or say i don't understand it. Likewise i keep saying and you keep ignoring, either trump authorised the military to take action through via the EO or he didn't and then the military is acting outside of their chain of command (here i can allow the 'according to the constitution' argument for them acting - although one can rightfully argue that has been successfully nullified decades ago in law, by acts of congress when making the UNITED STATES a corporation - buts that's another topic entirely).
LMFAO 3 replies without a response from me in a span of 3 hours
oh no, your not bothered at all, not triggered at all LMFAO
DEBOOKED LMFAO
coom harder coomlord...you sound like a sniveling jew, are you ethnically jewish?
Another tard reeeing 'You're a jew, you're a jew you're a jew'.
Still no answer whether issuing the EO constitutes trump giving authority to the military, huh ??/ .
Would just rather propagate msm nonsense or Q-tard public opinion that 'its bad for optics to call in the military'.
You can't have it both ways - but i guess you can keep AVOIDING to answer the question , lmao....
(post is archived)