Having employees that moonlight as spooks doesn't make you a governmental entity. Nor does getting capital venture from a front company that spooks use to circumvent accountability.
Getting govrnment money isn't what makes you a governmental organization subject to governmental restraint. You are trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole by twisting legalese. Thats not gonna fly.
There are private companies all over the country that do business with the government, get paid by the government, and/or contract with the government. None of them are the governnent and none of them are beholden to governmental restraint.
Again, don't use Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. Just stop. They don't control shit. They aren't the problem. At least not from the social media platform aspect. Google and Facebook definitely have vertical monopoly issues, but that's not related to being a governmental entity or a bill of rights (1A) issue. Thats an anti- trust issue related to issues much more broad than their social media aspects.
Like it or not they were created to control us. Like it or not they control the majority of the town square.
These are huge problems.
Like it or not, you have free will and personal responsibility.
I have not had anyone I tune in to, or read, banned such that I cant get their input. I support them. Who cares if I hear them on dLive, YouTube, Bitchute, Twitter , Trovo, Facebook, Gab, or etc?
Don't demand the very thing you believe to be corrupt as hell, the government, rush in an save you with legislation or executive orders at the expense of property rights being forced away from business owners. It won't work out well for us.
(post is archived)