Turing's "test" was a metaphor for today's transgender clown society. In Turing's test, the women try to convince you they're women, but the men like Michelle try to convince you otherwise. Sound familiar? Turning's "Test" has nothing to do with identifying "intelligent machines", but rather with identifying (creating*) what we now call "NPCs". Notice the conditions of passing Turing's "test" have nothing to do with the conditions of scientific inquiry or plain-old forensic investigation. (*It's crucial to realize that "identify" and "create" are synonymous terms in the information-theoretic context.) Intelligent AI is only created by the very act which identifies it. By its own design, Turing's test only works under the cloak of deception, yet it somehow generates a valid answer? What is the value of any conclusion when nothing confirmable has been presented in the first place? An AI isn't male or female, so for it to be considered generally "intelligent", male can't generally be distinguished from female. The fact that post-modern, transgender, anti-American, Jewish propaganda can't be distinguished from the deceptively sex-less conditions of the Turing's "test" is no mere coincidence.