well, to be fair, we probably shouldn't judge the software by who contributes - it's open source, and i'm pretty sure it would be of massive concern to the gov/mil/intel entities that use it were there a known exploit since the other side would also know about it
...of course that assumes that gov/mil/intel doesn't actually does use it
"well, to be fair, we probably shouldn't judge the software by who contributes**"
I have to respectfully disagree. I think it absolutely matters who contributes, when a country does so little for its native inhabitants that they flee in droves..the agencies that are involved with it are inherently corrupt and not to be trusted...extrapolate that out to other agencies' within the same government and explain to me why i should trust them? and what would make we want to in the future without a full regime change?
well, that's the thing with open source software - no one has to trust the developer or backers
were Tor proprietary and you had these same companies/foundations supporting it, that would be a massively different story
.... now i just contradicted myself because earlier i said i don't trust Tor :)
lol...we could talk around this for days...its chill. I think we both agree that Tor is no longer the answer, unfortunately the powers that be have cast enough doubt about its validity that its no longer an option...the other problem is that there is no filter on it and when you hit the index you see what comes up..even the creepy joe biden/netflix cuties kind of crap....and that shit makes me want to kill people and wipe their blood line from history.
(post is archived)