WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

954

Due to a design trend set by the retards geniusses at Apple (the same people that have always built phones with limited functionality and relatively weak, slow-charging batteries), nearly all mobile phones released in the last three years have non-replaceable batteries.

If you think about it, non-removable batteries are a rather terrible idea.(en.wikipedia.org)

The battery is the fastest-aging part of a mobile phone. Making it non-modular is an irrational and anti-logical idea.

A replacement by service usually defeats the water resistance seal.

Users should at least have the option to purchase mobile phones with replaceable batteries, to preserve the freedom of confident charging without bothering with / worrying about battery aging.

Preserving battery lifespan requires keeping the charge between around 25% to 75, but on a mobile phone with replaceable battery, one can always charge to 100% with full confidence, and not give any damn about battery lifespan, because it is always replaceable anyway!

Some of the lastest excellent mobile phones with replaceable batteries were the Galaxy S5 (early 2014), Galaxy Note 4 (late 2014) and LG V10 (2015), which actually still do well in 2019!

Apple iOS 13 has introduced a feature that limits battery charging to 80%. Android phones could do that with root-access apps for years, and some laptops had this feature for a decade.

But with a replaceable battery, one never needs to worry about that.

Also, I know that a non-replaceable battery allows slim design . But for me, practicality and functionality is always first.

Also, “slim design” has become a buzzword, and Apple has proven that Apple users still purchase the iPhone 11, despite of >8mm thickness (~2mm thicker than iPhone 6 and 6s), the same iSheep people that preached in 2013 that Android-running mobile phones such as ~7mm Galaxy S4 are “too thick” .

↓ expand content
Due to a design trend set by the ~~retards~~ geniusses at Apple (the same people that have always built phones with limited functionality and relatively weak, slow-charging batteries), nearly all mobile phones released in the last three years have **non-replaceable batteries.** If you think about it, non-removable batteries are a rather [terrible idea.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence#battery) The battery is the fastest-aging part of a mobile phone. Making it non-modular is an irrational and anti-logical idea. A replacement by service usually defeats the water resistance seal. Users should at least have **the option** to purchase mobile phones with replaceable batteries, to preserve the freedom of confident charging without bothering with / worrying about battery aging. Preserving battery lifespan requires keeping the charge between around 25% to 75, but on a mobile phone with replaceable battery, one can always charge to 100% with full confidence, and not give any damn about battery lifespan, **because it is always replaceable anyway!** Some of the lastest excellent mobile phones with replaceable batteries were the Galaxy S5 (early 2014), Galaxy Note 4 (late 2014) and LG V10 (2015), which actually still do well in 2019! Apple iOS 13 has introduced a feature that limits battery charging to 80%. Android phones could do that with root-access apps for years, and some laptops had this feature for a decade. But with a replaceable battery, one never needs to worry about that. Also, I know that a non-replaceable battery allows **slim design**. But for me, practicality and functionality is always first. Also, *“slim design”* has become a buzzword, and Apple has proven that Apple users still purchase the iPhone 11, despite of >8mm thickness (~2mm thicker than iPhone 6 and 6s), the same ~~iSheep~~ people that preached in 2013 that Android-running mobile phones such as ~7mm Galaxy S4 are *“too thick”*.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts 5y

Disclaimer: Despite of my suggestive username, I am not an Android fanboy .

I think Android is also far from perfect. I wrote this Wikipedia draft article of Android's removed features(web.archive.org) (before Bbb23 , the most despicable Wikipedia administrator, decided to erase it for no reason).

[–] 2 pts 5y

Well yeah, but it is the least bad... kind of