If I'm not mistaken, you're responding to the guy saying that if "you have that MRNA code in your body, you can't copy it without their permission."
But I don't think he means your cells aren't allowed to copy the mRNA code, as your cells don't have a mind of it's own. From my understanding, a pharma company can't reuse that specific mRNA code and alter it for themselves. But then the question is, doesn't every cell in your body get the mRNA code from the original pharma? Or is it specific to some types of cells?
It was meant to elaborate on a misconception that's thrown around this place (and others). mRNA "vaccines" aren't supposed to modify the DNA of your cells, unless they also include the coding for reverse transcription. If it does, it would be a massive scandal (or at least, it should...)
doesn't every cell in your body get the mRNA code from the original pharma?
The injection contains a limited number of particules so, at most, that number of cells will be affected by the foreign RNA. Some particules will be destroyed (I've seen mentions that they're not stable, which is why the drug must be stored at low temperatures), some will fail to enter a cell, etc. The synthetic mRNA "vaccines" cannot replicate, unless there's something we haven't been told. The adenovirus based "vaccines" are supposed to have their replication genes taken out.
I haven't seen anything about the particules requiring a specific type of cells. The injection site is supposed to be intra-muscular, some nurses inject it in veins instead and we know the particules can enter blood vessel lining cells. Adenovirus-based "vaccines" seems to have an affinity to epithelial cells (organ lining, blood vessels lining, muscles).
>The injection contains a limited number of particules so, at most, that number of cells will be affected by the foreign RNA.
That got me thinking. Cells usually have a cycle of 7 days if I remember correctly... so if the mRNA was successfuly injected into a cell that only has a lifespan of 7 days, then theoretically the mRNA would theoretically also end its cycle along with it (but viruse's aren't alive anyway). So there's 3 scenarios I can think of:
Does the mRNA get duplicated by other cells? Does it 'die' after your cell dies? Does it continue injecting itself into other cells after the previous cell dies?
AFAIK, the RNA doesn't get duplicated. Cells will copy a gene from the nucleus (DNA) into a segment of RNA and bring it into the body of the cell. Cells will work with this segment until it degrades. I don't the timespan for the "vaccines'" mRNA, but what I'm seeing is an average of 600 minutes in general.
Natural virus do contain genes to encode proteins to do a bunch of stuff, including reverse transcription (incorporating changes into the DNA). The "vaccines" manufacturers didn't include in their documentation any indication that such genes are present; only the spike protein code is confirmed.
edit: mRNA should be destroyed after a cell dies. If the mRNA is gets outside a cell, it could enter another cell, but naked RNA isn't stable and may degrade before being translated (into a protein). This instability is the rationale for the lipid nanoparticle used to encapsulate the RNA, to ease the delivery of the payload.
(post is archived)