Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

667

Are there people on Poal who actually believe the conspiracy theory that a group of government bureaucrats were able to work together and fire a Jiffy Popper a quarter of a million miles through the empty black and insane radiation of space, precisely reaching and landing on the surface of the moon using the computing power of a cereal prize calculator?

Are there people on Poal who actually believe the conspiracy theory that a group of government bureaucrats were able to work together and fire a Jiffy Popper a quarter of a million miles through the empty black and insane radiation of space, precisely reaching and landing on the surface of the moon using the computing power of a cereal prize calculator?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (45).
[–] • 0 pt

I just reread this from a month ago.

To be fair he linked to https://youtu.be/lNiscigIgBc

And you soon denied he provided anything

The good nature in me assume you missed his comment and replied accordingly

[–] • 0 pt

The video has some generic information but it does not add anything specific on the supposed path of the craft trough the vanallen belt.

Yes, there is a statement like, we went trough where it was not dangerous. But, was it ? was it even possible ? (fuel consumption and target compatibility ?)

Again, take the OFFICIAL tapes and images, you have some "glitches" in the OFFICIAL documentation like responses arriving before it is possible, footprints that have sharp edges, analysis on parallaxes of images that do not match the supposed distance of field.

Plus, as far as I know, there are no recent pictures of the landing sites, taken by Russia or China and it is forbidden to go "around there".

So, again, relax, you cannot explain the glitches, many have tried to debunk them and have failed. No new documentation is available, the project documentation (how to build the mission) is LOST and we cannot simply "redo it"

We may live long enough for this (USA on the moon) to be verified or not.

I am not holding my breath, nor should you.

Have a nice day.

[–] • 0 pt

many have tried to debunk them and have failed.

Funny you mention that.

You have a thesis that the Van Allen belt can not be traveled through, correct? But, if you look closely:

You are the one, actually, who has not done any debunking.

If you were consistent with your beliefs. You would see that your own set of standards is something that you, yourself, have not lived up to in this conversation.

Not that there is anything wrong with that, but it is a folly to cast expectations on other people that you don't cast on yourself.

Merely stating x isn't true and then expecting somebody to "prove" otherwise, while not addressing evidence brought up in conversation is not intellectually honest.

I am not sure how- but you seemed to have watched that video and dismissed it entirely based on the fact that it failed to provide the exact path the craft took. The video did not set out to accomplish that. It seems silly to say "well, this video didn't provide something, so I will ignore it outright."

[–] • 0 pt

Look, I said before, relax, take it easy

The video you gave does not provide a "solution" to the issue, no matter how much you swear it does. It is useless for me to point out where and when, you will simply go on.

Have a peace of mind and relax, eventually we will find out what did happen.

in the meantime, live you life and be happy.