Its been 48 Years since we last left Low Earth Orbit.

Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Thats from newton himself.

http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

https://nypost.com/2014/04/03/bill-clinton-an-alien-attack-would-unite-us-i-investigated-area-51/

https://youtu.be/CDScioLF-PQ

Gather around niggers and faggots for it is that special time of the year where i once again endeavor to educate a certain type who sees it all except that which is clear before him. For those of you who are familiar with how straight lines work you will appreciate this expansion.

Resolution power:

Lets talk about resolution. Resolution is the quality of the image, how many points are distinguishable from each other enabling greater detail/clarity. For instance if you were to place two dots as close to each other on a piece of paper as you possibly could while still being able to easy see them as two dots. Then place that paper across the room on the wall from you would be able to back away from the paper until a distance between you and it is reached so that the two dots no longer are distinguishable from each other, but now appear to be one single dot.

https://files.catbox.moe/bybvox.PNG

It looks like a single dot but we know its not, while staring at the single dot one could use a phone camera to zoom in and clearly see its still two dots. This would be the resolution power difference between the human eye and the device. The human eye has a 0.0003 radian resolution, it can detect objects 30cm apart at a distance of 1km assuming 20/20 vision. This is why we use telescopes to view things that are far, and microscopes to view things that are small.

Vanishing point:

https://files.catbox.moe/zjaz24.jpg

The vanishing point is the optical illusion created when circumstances are met so that two objects appear to have converged into one. This is a direct result of the Angle of view and Resolution power of the observer in respect to the observed.

With our understanding now of Resolution and Perspective we can move forward to explaining why objects disappear "bottom up". You could for instance lay down on your stomach in a field and have your friend walk away from you and you'll notice that as he moves further away from you his legs will start to merge/ disappear into the grass before his torso. This is because if you were to draw a straight line from the lens of your eye to where you are looking at your friends legs as he moves away the grass will start to intersect the line of observation thus creating two points that no longer become distinguishable from each other. If you were to stand up the tangent point of the grass and your friends legs now becomes two objects that are easy to distinguish from each other.

Ship sinking effect/ bottom up/ false horizon/

Now lets go to a beach on a clear day with a pair of binoculars and a super zoom camera. If you were to lay down on the beach and watch a ship sail away until it starts to disappear bottom up, this effect being caused by the waves between the observer and observed becoming converged by limits of angle AND resolution. Now stand up and notice how the same boat came back into view, this is because the two points now become observably further away from each other allowing them to be distinguished.

https://files.catbox.moe/y1xr0k.PNG

In the same standing position let the ship move further away so that it appears as it did when laying down, only this time use a pair of binoculars to observe. Instead of modifying angle, we modified resolution. The points between the ship and the lens over the binoculars now being easier to distinguish as individual points.

Waiting for the ship to completely vanish now bring out the super zoom camera and focus on the ship. All done without adjusting height of observation (angle of view) or position of observation.

When a ship or object disappears bottom up it has nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. This phenomena is how your eyes work and would be observed on BOTH a globe model or a flat model of the Earth. The height required to actually observe the curvature effect of the earth is between 35,000 FT and 40,000 FT provided accesses to 60 degree FOV.

All arguments saying X object disappearing proves Y are null and void, their promoters low IQ niggers that had to have someone hold their hand on how your own eyes work.

https://files.catbox.moe/l1v72w.PNG

https://files.catbox.moe/u7caga.PNG ------------------------------ Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference * https://www.bitchute.com/video/ULx67SqaB5P7/ * https://youtu.be/BI_ZehPOMwI (One odd moment of many) * https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0 -------------------------------- * Apollo11 interview 1989 https://youtu.be/u_Si8Lsyr_0 * https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4714396/Nasa-DESTROYED-hundreds-mysterious-tapes.html * https://www.nasa.gov/feature/not-unsolved-mysteries-the-lost-apollo-11-tapes * https://files.catbox.moe/5wxcmi.PNG * https://files.catbox.moe/fseu1p.jpg * https://www.cnet.com/news/how-nasa-trains-astronauts-40-feet-under-water/ * https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/nasa-s-neutral-buoyancy-lab-is-like-zero-gravity-on-earth-1003330115607 * https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/take-a-tour-of-nasa-s-full-size-mockup-of-the-international-space-station-1001749059815 * https://www.scubadiving.com/nasas-underwater-lab * https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nasa+NBL&t=hp&iax=images&ia=images --------- * https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237819/NASAs-ingenious-moon-simulator-helped-prepare-Apollo-astronauts-land-gone-before.html * https://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/multimedia/project-lola.html --------- * https://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Additional_Photos_for_the_Impact_Dynamics_Research_Facility * https://files.catbox.moe/jbh1ix.png Video backups; * Globalists and their lies prove the earth is flat https://www.bitchute.com/video/bWRgmgyjobmf/ * Simple Proof that the ISS is Nothing More than a Hollywood Production https://files.catbox.moe/3km5oq.mp4 * The ISS Exposed https://files.catbox.moe/5mp5mv.mp4 * A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon https://www.bitchute.com/video/7m8rlf5PfUjo/ * 7 Rockets Hit Dome! https://files.catbox.moe/a09e9u.mp4 * Flat Earth Awakening ~ Fake Space Documentary 2019 https://files.catbox.moe/s6s322.mp4 * Are We Spinning? * Astronauts Gone Wild https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TosA56Sgyp6/ * https://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/Rockefeller_Initiative_Documents.htm The same pedophiles that rape your kids are the same pedophiles that go to space * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12743 --------- * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16737 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45095 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2290 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43067 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47438 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29385 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/447 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20027 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/51709 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/54465 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/58660 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/621 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3115 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23925 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29070 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/40673 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45274 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tom buy my tshirts delonge coms * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/50448 * https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=tom+delonge * https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/hillary-clinton-ufo-aliens-podesta/ * http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/Rockefeller%20Documents/RID-11-1-95.htm#1 * 1947 * Fishbowl * Highjump * https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/01/503973422/buzz-aldrin-is-medically-evacuated-from-antarctica * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_United_Nations >Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers. Thats from newton himself. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258 https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG * http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258 https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG https://nypost.com/2014/04/03/bill-clinton-an-alien-attack-would-unite-us-i-investigated-area-51/ https://youtu.be/CDScioLF-PQ -------------------------------- Gather around niggers and faggots for it is that special time of the year where i once again endeavor to educate a certain type who sees it all except that which is clear before him. For those of you who are familiar with how straight lines work you will appreciate this expansion. Resolution power: Lets talk about resolution. Resolution is the quality of the image, how many points are distinguishable from each other enabling greater detail/clarity. For instance if you were to place two dots as close to each other on a piece of paper as you possibly could while still being able to easy see them as two dots. Then place that paper across the room on the wall from you would be able to back away from the paper until a distance between you and it is reached so that the two dots no longer are distinguishable from each other, but now appear to be one single dot. * https://files.catbox.moe/bybvox.PNG It looks like a single dot but we know its not, while staring at the single dot one could use a phone camera to zoom in and clearly see its still two dots. This would be the resolution power difference between the human eye and the device. The human eye has a 0.0003 radian resolution, it can detect objects 30cm apart at a distance of 1km assuming 20/20 vision. This is why we use telescopes to view things that are far, and microscopes to view things that are small. Vanishing point: * https://files.catbox.moe/zjaz24.jpg The vanishing point is the optical illusion created when circumstances are met so that two objects appear to have converged into one. This is a direct result of the Angle of view and Resolution power of the observer in respect to the observed. * https://files.catbox.moe/70h8w1.jpg * https://files.catbox.moe/qkr5yf.gif * https://files.catbox.moe/43kfzg.png * https://files.catbox.moe/pkjef2.jpg --------------------------------------------------------- With our understanding now of Resolution and Perspective we can move forward to explaining why objects disappear "bottom up". You could for instance lay down on your stomach in a field and have your friend walk away from you and you'll notice that as he moves further away from you his legs will start to merge/ disappear into the grass before his torso. This is because if you were to draw a straight line from the lens of your eye to where you are looking at your friends legs as he moves away the grass will start to intersect the line of observation thus creating two points that no longer become distinguishable from each other. If you were to stand up the tangent point of the grass and your friends legs now becomes two objects that are easy to distinguish from each other. Ship sinking effect/ bottom up/ false horizon/ * https://files.catbox.moe/lpxfhl.jpg * https://files.catbox.moe/k1vi2g.PNG Now lets go to a beach on a clear day with a pair of binoculars and a super zoom camera. If you were to lay down on the beach and watch a ship sail away until it starts to disappear bottom up, this effect being caused by the waves between the observer and observed becoming converged by limits of angle AND resolution. Now stand up and notice how the same boat came back into view, this is because the two points now become observably further away from each other allowing them to be distinguished. https://files.catbox.moe/y1xr0k.PNG In the same standing position let the ship move further away so that it appears as it did when laying down, only this time use a pair of binoculars to observe. Instead of modifying angle, we modified resolution. The points between the ship and the lens over the binoculars now being easier to distinguish as individual points. Waiting for the ship to completely vanish now bring out the super zoom camera and focus on the ship. All done without adjusting height of observation (angle of view) or position of observation. When a ship or object disappears bottom up it has nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. This phenomena is how your eyes work and would be observed on BOTH a globe model or a flat model of the Earth. The height required to actually observe the curvature effect of the earth is between 35,000 FT and 40,000 FT provided accesses to 60 degree FOV. All arguments saying X object disappearing proves Y are null and void, their promoters low IQ niggers that had to have someone hold their hand on how your own eyes work. https://files.catbox.moe/l1v72w.PNG

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not following.

(edited )

The Stars that orbit Polaris are easier to visualize and explain, as its center of rotation would be above the north pole, Whereas the stars that orbit Sigma Octantis are not centered above the South pole on a globe model but rather it is a Southern Celestial Pole, a constant point above the sky with its rotating stars. Unlike Polaris, it can not be seen from every point along the same latitude, is not centrally placed and as such is not motionless. Which is why its not a true southern star. This is important for when we flatten out the model resulting in Sigma Octantis being pushed to the circumference.

When the model becomes flattened out the North system remains above the North Pole, Where as the southern Celestial pole would be on the outer edges (to due being 1 degree off the south pole) of the flat eath as this southern sky is now stretched out. which is why the southern cross is not visible from every longitude on the same latitude as in the case with Polaris, and why you would be able to observe Ursa Major which is near polaris down at 30 degrees south It also explains why Vulpecula, Taurus, leo Ect can be seen from 90 degrees north to 65 degrees south.

Single set of stars theory,

https://files.catbox.moe/xws22k.jpg

https://youtu.be/Z6SK7FmNEXc

https://youtu.be/m7aEZqA3Huk

https://youtu.be/tNCqOoITczM

Multiple set theory, \

https://youtu.be/AKWtbqP_drI

I think it would be easier if i explained/ clarified the rationale behind the Localized Sun and Moon first and then explained what i am visualizing for the stars. Only due to the limitations of my speech. With a flat model the Sun and Moon would be smaller and closer/ tighter to the Earth. They would be orbiting the North pole with a shortening and prolonging of their orbits giving rise to the seasons and weather/tides. The observer would see the Sun pass overhead on its Clockwise rotation and due to the light source now being much closer to the surface of the earth the Sun would appear to set as it moves further into the distance. Giving us night and day. The Stars that orbit Polaris are easier to visualize and explain, as its center of rotation would be above the north pole, Whereas the stars that orbit Sigma Octantis are not centered above the South pole on a globe model but rather it is a Southern Celestial Pole, a constant point above the sky with its rotating stars. Unlike Polaris, it can not be seen from every point along the same latitude, is not centrally placed and as such is not motionless. Which is why its not a true southern star. This is important for when we flatten out the model resulting in Sigma Octantis being pushed to the circumference. When the model becomes flattened out the North system remains above the North Pole, Where as the southern Celestial pole would be on the outer edges (to due being 1 degree off the south pole) of the flat eath as this southern sky is now stretched out. which is why the southern cross is not visible from every longitude on the same latitude as in the case with Polaris, and why you would be able to observe Ursa Major which is near polaris down at 30 degrees south It also explains why Vulpecula, Taurus, leo Ect can be seen from 90 degrees north to 65 degrees south. Single set of stars theory, https://files.catbox.moe/xws22k.jpg https://youtu.be/Z6SK7FmNEXc https://youtu.be/m7aEZqA3Huk https://youtu.be/tNCqOoITczM Multiple set theory, \ https://youtu.be/AKWtbqP_drI

why the southern cross is not visible from every longitude on the same latitude as in the case with Polaris

That's because the precession of the Earth takes 26,000 years to change which stars are visible.

* https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest