WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

219

https://files.catbox.moe/u7caga.PNG


Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference

* https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0



Video backups;

  • Globalists and their lies prove the earth is flat

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bWRgmgyjobmf/

  • Simple Proof that the ISS is Nothing More than a Hollywood Production

https://files.catbox.moe/3km5oq.mp4

  • The ISS Exposed

https://files.catbox.moe/5mp5mv.mp4

  • A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7m8rlf5PfUjo/

  • 7 Rockets Hit Dome!

https://files.catbox.moe/a09e9u.mp4

  • Flat Earth Awakening ~ Fake Space Documentary 2019

https://files.catbox.moe/s6s322.mp4

  • Are We Spinning?

  • Astronauts Gone Wild

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TosA56Sgyp6/

The same pedophiles that rape your kids are the same pedophiles that go to space



Tom buy my tshirts delonge coms

Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Thats from newton himself.

http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

https://nypost.com/2014/04/03/bill-clinton-an-alien-attack-would-unite-us-i-investigated-area-51/

https://youtu.be/CDScioLF-PQ


Gather around niggers and faggots for it is that special time of the year where i once again endeavor to educate a certain type who sees it all except that which is clear before him. For those of you who are familiar with how straight lines work you will appreciate this expansion.

Resolution power:

Lets talk about resolution. Resolution is the quality of the image, how many points are distinguishable from each other enabling greater detail/clarity. For instance if you were to place two dots as close to each other on a piece of paper as you possibly could while still being able to easy see them as two dots. Then place that paper across the room on the wall from you would be able to back away from the paper until a distance between you and it is reached so that the two dots no longer are distinguishable from each other, but now appear to be one single dot.

It looks like a single dot but we know its not, while staring at the single dot one could use a phone camera to zoom in and clearly see its still two dots. This would be the resolution power difference between the human eye and the device. The human eye has a 0.0003 radian resolution, it can detect objects 30cm apart at a distance of 1km assuming 20/20 vision. This is why we use telescopes to view things that are far, and microscopes to view things that are small.

Vanishing point:

The vanishing point is the optical illusion created when circumstances are met so that two objects appear to have converged into one. This is a direct result of the Angle of view and Resolution power of the observer in respect to the observed.


With our understanding now of Resolution and Perspective we can move forward to explaining why objects disappear "bottom up". You could for instance lay down on your stomach in a field and have your friend walk away from you and you'll notice that as he moves further away from you his legs will start to merge/ disappear into the grass before his torso. This is because if you were to draw a straight line from the lens of your eye to where you are looking at your friends legs as he moves away the grass will start to intersect the line of observation thus creating two points that no longer become distinguishable from each other. If you were to stand up the tangent point of the grass and your friends legs now becomes two objects that are easy to distinguish from each other.

Ship sinking effect/ bottom up/ false horizon/

Now lets go to a beach on a clear day with a pair of binoculars and a super zoom camera. If you were to lay down on the beach and watch a ship sail away until it starts to disappear bottom up, this effect being caused by the waves between the observer and observed becoming converged by limits of angle AND resolution. Now stand up and notice how the same boat came back into view, this is because the two points now become observably further away from each other allowing them to be distinguished.

https://files.catbox.moe/y1xr0k.PNG

In the same standing position let the ship move further away so that it appears as it did when laying down, only this time use a pair of binoculars to observe. Instead of modifying angle, we modified resolution. The points between the ship and the lens over the binoculars now being easier to distinguish as individual points.

Waiting for the ship to completely vanish now bring out the super zoom camera and focus on the ship. All done without adjusting height of observation (angle of view) or position of observation.

When a ship or object disappears bottom up it has nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. This phenomena is how your eyes work and would be observed on BOTH a globe model or a flat model of the Earth. The height required to actually observe the curvature effect of the earth is between 35,000 FT and 40,000 FT provided accesses to 60 degree FOV.

All arguments saying X object disappearing proves Y are null and void, their promoters low IQ niggers that had to have someone hold their hand on how your own eyes work.

https://files.catbox.moe/l1v72w.PNG

https://files.catbox.moe/u7caga.PNG ------------------------------ Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference * https://www.bitchute.com/video/ULx67SqaB5P7/ * https://youtu.be/BI_ZehPOMwI (One odd moment of many) * https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0 -------------------------------- * Apollo11 interview 1989 https://youtu.be/u_Si8Lsyr_0 * https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4714396/Nasa-DESTROYED-hundreds-mysterious-tapes.html * https://www.nasa.gov/feature/not-unsolved-mysteries-the-lost-apollo-11-tapes * https://files.catbox.moe/5wxcmi.PNG * https://files.catbox.moe/fseu1p.jpg * https://www.cnet.com/news/how-nasa-trains-astronauts-40-feet-under-water/ * https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/nasa-s-neutral-buoyancy-lab-is-like-zero-gravity-on-earth-1003330115607 * https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/video/take-a-tour-of-nasa-s-full-size-mockup-of-the-international-space-station-1001749059815 * https://www.scubadiving.com/nasas-underwater-lab * https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nasa+NBL&t=hp&iax=images&ia=images --------- * https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237819/NASAs-ingenious-moon-simulator-helped-prepare-Apollo-astronauts-land-gone-before.html * https://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/multimedia/project-lola.html --------- * https://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Additional_Photos_for_the_Impact_Dynamics_Research_Facility * https://files.catbox.moe/jbh1ix.png Video backups; * Globalists and their lies prove the earth is flat https://www.bitchute.com/video/bWRgmgyjobmf/ * Simple Proof that the ISS is Nothing More than a Hollywood Production https://files.catbox.moe/3km5oq.mp4 * The ISS Exposed https://files.catbox.moe/5mp5mv.mp4 * A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon https://www.bitchute.com/video/7m8rlf5PfUjo/ * 7 Rockets Hit Dome! https://files.catbox.moe/a09e9u.mp4 * Flat Earth Awakening ~ Fake Space Documentary 2019 https://files.catbox.moe/s6s322.mp4 * Are We Spinning? * Astronauts Gone Wild https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TosA56Sgyp6/ * https://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/Rockefeller_Initiative_Documents.htm The same pedophiles that rape your kids are the same pedophiles that go to space * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12743 --------- * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16737 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45095 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2290 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43067 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47438 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29385 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/447 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20027 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/51709 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/54465 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/58660 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/621 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3115 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23925 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29070 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/40673 * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45274 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tom buy my tshirts delonge coms * https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/50448 * https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=tom+delonge * https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/hillary-clinton-ufo-aliens-podesta/ * http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/Rockefeller%20Documents/RID-11-1-95.htm#1 * 1947 * Fishbowl * Highjump * https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/01/503973422/buzz-aldrin-is-medically-evacuated-from-antarctica * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_United_Nations >Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers. Thats from newton himself. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258 https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG * http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258 https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG https://nypost.com/2014/04/03/bill-clinton-an-alien-attack-would-unite-us-i-investigated-area-51/ https://youtu.be/CDScioLF-PQ -------------------------------- Gather around niggers and faggots for it is that special time of the year where i once again endeavor to educate a certain type who sees it all except that which is clear before him. For those of you who are familiar with how straight lines work you will appreciate this expansion. Resolution power: Lets talk about resolution. Resolution is the quality of the image, how many points are distinguishable from each other enabling greater detail/clarity. For instance if you were to place two dots as close to each other on a piece of paper as you possibly could while still being able to easy see them as two dots. Then place that paper across the room on the wall from you would be able to back away from the paper until a distance between you and it is reached so that the two dots no longer are distinguishable from each other, but now appear to be one single dot. * https://files.catbox.moe/bybvox.PNG It looks like a single dot but we know its not, while staring at the single dot one could use a phone camera to zoom in and clearly see its still two dots. This would be the resolution power difference between the human eye and the device. The human eye has a 0.0003 radian resolution, it can detect objects 30cm apart at a distance of 1km assuming 20/20 vision. This is why we use telescopes to view things that are far, and microscopes to view things that are small. Vanishing point: * https://files.catbox.moe/zjaz24.jpg The vanishing point is the optical illusion created when circumstances are met so that two objects appear to have converged into one. This is a direct result of the Angle of view and Resolution power of the observer in respect to the observed. * https://files.catbox.moe/70h8w1.jpg * https://files.catbox.moe/qkr5yf.gif * https://files.catbox.moe/43kfzg.png * https://files.catbox.moe/pkjef2.jpg --------------------------------------------------------- With our understanding now of Resolution and Perspective we can move forward to explaining why objects disappear "bottom up". You could for instance lay down on your stomach in a field and have your friend walk away from you and you'll notice that as he moves further away from you his legs will start to merge/ disappear into the grass before his torso. This is because if you were to draw a straight line from the lens of your eye to where you are looking at your friends legs as he moves away the grass will start to intersect the line of observation thus creating two points that no longer become distinguishable from each other. If you were to stand up the tangent point of the grass and your friends legs now becomes two objects that are easy to distinguish from each other. Ship sinking effect/ bottom up/ false horizon/ * https://files.catbox.moe/lpxfhl.jpg * https://files.catbox.moe/k1vi2g.PNG Now lets go to a beach on a clear day with a pair of binoculars and a super zoom camera. If you were to lay down on the beach and watch a ship sail away until it starts to disappear bottom up, this effect being caused by the waves between the observer and observed becoming converged by limits of angle AND resolution. Now stand up and notice how the same boat came back into view, this is because the two points now become observably further away from each other allowing them to be distinguished. https://files.catbox.moe/y1xr0k.PNG In the same standing position let the ship move further away so that it appears as it did when laying down, only this time use a pair of binoculars to observe. Instead of modifying angle, we modified resolution. The points between the ship and the lens over the binoculars now being easier to distinguish as individual points. Waiting for the ship to completely vanish now bring out the super zoom camera and focus on the ship. All done without adjusting height of observation (angle of view) or position of observation. When a ship or object disappears bottom up it has nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. This phenomena is how your eyes work and would be observed on BOTH a globe model or a flat model of the Earth. The height required to actually observe the curvature effect of the earth is between 35,000 FT and 40,000 FT provided accesses to 60 degree FOV. All arguments saying X object disappearing proves Y are null and void, their promoters low IQ niggers that had to have someone hold their hand on how your own eyes work. https://files.catbox.moe/l1v72w.PNG

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

I can’t wrap my head around any of the math or science in this but the astronaut head tilting thing has me seriously thinking what the actual fuck!!!

I always thought the moon landings were fake, or at least the footage we saw was fake, and now I’m convinced the ISS is as well.

People already think I’m a tinfoil hat wearer, now there gonna think I’m genuinely looney

[–] 1 pt

Inverting reality to further enslave the goy into a maze from which he cannot escape.

[–] 0 pt

Can't decide between calling you a shill or laugh at the people you're fooling

[–] 1 pt

Laugh at me instead because i genuinely am skeptical of heliocentrism and i am open to other models. A localized Sun and Moon of equal proportion would give the same data Eratosthenes gathered, a localized effect of the moon alone for a lunar eclipse is an option i'm entertaining.

The sure amount of verifiable fuckery surrounding this topic should be reason enough to interest you in suspending your disbelief. It's suspicious to me how many are not intrigued at the thought that the footage showing people inside the International Space Station could be fraudulent, or that the Apollo program could have been a giant big fat hoax.

They've been caught with their hands in the cookie jar with the same MO as their other operations and for some reason it doesn't catch even a little bit of interest? Are you unable to entertain an idea without having believed it to be correct?

[–] 4 pts

Even my 88 year old dad wonders why there's been zero progress in the realm of space travel since the alleged moon landings over 40 years ago.

[–] 0 pt
  • Esoteric- "Designed for or understood by the specially initiated alone."

  • Symbol- "An object or act representing something in the unconscious mind that has been repressed."

  • Liminality- "The threshold of disorientation between pre-ritual and post-ritual mind".

Premise: We exist as slave class. Our allowable knowledgebase reflects this. Education and sciences are controlled and guided in the same manner as everything else we could be exposed to. This limits the available bandwidth of information we would be willing to consider.

  • They lie about History and Anthropology/ Human timeline.

  • They lie about Biology and Medicine.


Somehow they gained control, be it cyclical or otherwise our present situation is all the evidence we need. Lies within lies never to be unraveled with any certainty, behind each mage another veil to send us to stumble in tangled fashion. In this system the keepers hold no real value, liberation by means of independence for truth. If I myself were in their position, could I not create such a false reality that the goy could never recover? Unknown Generations of continued dialogue for these regards can't you see how successful its all been? The lies of the Vatican and Smithsonian are astounding yet few seem to willing to entertain the possibility.

The more you learn how much there is to unlearn the easier this premise becomes. If you were to develop a video game, or a board game you'd have to use a system of numerical value to accomplish these means. Within the system itself the mathematics would be completely valid, patterns and functions within being a result of the original numerical assignment. Lets say one of us were to create such an egregore, would it not seem likely to find us using the numbers 14 and 88 to some degree? Would not perhaps their roots and sums play an important role in the system?

The Circled Square is created by taking a Square with a perimeter of 8 and overlaying it with a Circle with a circumference of 9. This is its unexpanded form.

Expanded Form:

The Circle within the Square: A circle placed within and against all sides of the Square.

The Circle above the Square: Taking the distance between the top of the Square and the top of the Circle at its mid sagittal plane gives us the center point and radius for the smaller circle of the symbol.

Pythagoras Triangle: The right angle formed against the exterior of the smaller circle and the top line of the Square. The length of the Hypotenuse being constrained from the top corner of the Square and the height of the smaller circle.

Golden Triangle: The equilateral triangle is formed by making the top of the Square its base. Expanding this triangle into a larger equilateral triangle that encompasses and intersects the Square. Once expanded Golden Triangles are formed on either side. Either Golden or Equilateral triangle will give you the golden ratio.

The Square represents the body, The circle that intersects it the Spirit.

The Circle within the Square is the Earth

The Circle above the Square is the Moon

From the Circled Square, many things can be derived.

[–] 0 pt

I hate to say it but I am lost and do not understand all of that. I wish that wasn't the case because I find the subject and the implications of it entirely fascinating.

[–] 1 pt

So much sauce the "i <3 science" peeps are locked up.

[–] 0 pt

I agree with your skeptism of (((authority))), but I cannot fathom how Polaris and Sigma Octantis can both be poles in the sky at the same time, without us residing on a 3D rotating body. Further, they're both in opposite directions, and have stars rotating around them in clockwise and counterclockwise fashion.

How is this possible if the Earth is flat. Show me how for an observer, all of the night sky can rotate around two different stars that are in two different directions.

[–] 0 pt

I've thought of that as well and have found some theories

Anti Crepuscular effect similar to sunrays creating the illusion that they are in opposite directions

Two fields of orbiting bodies with Polaris and sigma octant at their center, one field being closer to the observer than the other at an titled axis for its vector

Firmament mirror theory (I dont like this one)

Both sides bring up valid points.

[–] 1 pt

Two fields of orbiting bodies with Polaris and sigma octant at their center.

You can stand on the equator and see both rotations at once, with Polaris and Sigma Octantis on opposite ends of the horizon. It's one field of stars rotating with two poles.

[–] 0 pt

>You can stand on the equator and see both rotations at once,

That is interesting,

If one field were to be much higher than the other, and the lower one being Closer or tighter to the earth in the south that would enable both to be seen from the equator and south while unable to be seen by the north. Same logic for localized sun and moon for rise and fall.

Everything we were told is a swindle, a scam. A jewish chutzpah. All for the goyims sheckles.