WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

This is the real question.

This is the real question.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You're so wrong dude. Just random sequence of smashing the keyboard (typewriter keys) would eventually over some finite amount of time (given an infinite) produce an identical copy to Shakespeare. That's just how RNG and (infinite) time work.

Here's a rudimentary example. Let's say there are ONLY lowercase letters on a keyboard. So 26. You have a 26 sided die to represent random punching of keys. If you roll that die enough times - have each die face represent a key - the sequence will give strings of readable text of properly spell words.

[–] 0 pt

It would not ever produce a copy of Shakespeare with monkeys banging on a typewriter. Monkeys are not a random number generator.

[–] 1 pt

With respect to this example, they effectively are. I am not very sure how you can't see that. A random number generator isn't even a random number generator. It's a lie and they're at BEST pseudo random.

[–] 0 pt

Yes that is true that random number generators are a lie.

There is no way in hell a monkey would ever produce Shakespeare with spaces between words and no spelling errors in the entire existence of the universe.

That is a myth