No. He would destroy the typewriter.
No. He would destroy the typewriter.
You are really stretching probability, there.
You are really stretching probability, there.
Pawn it for drug money
Pawn it for drug money
Blame it on whitey for not typing out the story for him to add his "pookienigga" nom de plume to it
Blame it on whitey for not typing out the story for him to add his "pookienigga" nom de plume to it
A monkey with a typewriter would not produce Shakespeare ever, given all the time that exists it still would not ever happen.
Neither would a nigger
A monkey with a typewriter would not produce Shakespeare ever, given all the time that exists it still would not ever happen.
Neither would a nigger
You're so wrong dude. Just random sequence of smashing the keyboard (typewriter keys) would eventually over some finite amount of time (given an infinite) produce an identical copy to Shakespeare. That's just how RNG and (infinite) time work.
Here's a rudimentary example. Let's say there are ONLY lowercase letters on a keyboard. So 26. You have a 26 sided die to represent random punching of keys. If you roll that die enough times - have each die face represent a key - the sequence will give strings of readable text of properly spell words.
You're so wrong dude.
Just random sequence of smashing the keyboard (typewriter keys) would eventually over some finite amount of time (given an infinite) produce an identical copy to Shakespeare. That's just how RNG and (infinite) time work.
Here's a rudimentary example.
Let's say there are ONLY lowercase letters on a keyboard. So 26.
You have a 26 sided die to represent random punching of keys.
If you roll that die enough times - have each die face represent a key - the sequence will give strings of readable text of properly spell words.
It would not ever produce a copy of Shakespeare with monkeys banging on a typewriter. Monkeys are not a random number generator.
It would not ever produce a copy of Shakespeare with monkeys banging on a typewriter. Monkeys are not a random number generator.
With respect to this example, they effectively are. I am not very sure how you can't see that. A random number generator isn't even a random number generator. It's a lie and they're at BEST pseudo random.
With respect to this example, they effectively are. I am not very sure how you can't see that.
A random number generator isn't even a random number generator.
It's a lie and they're at BEST pseudo random.
(post is archived)