> Maybe go look through a telescope some day. You're a retard. You think looking through a telescope to peer at your neighbor's house is the same as trying to resolve a satellite over 300,000 meters away, through the entire Earth's atmosphere, while it's moving across the sky? > Satellites are real, that's why we have all these expensive to construct and maintain radio towers, and under sea cables. Holy fuck, you're retarded. First of all, all the evidence points to satellites being real, whether it's GPS signals, triangulation, or actual observations, which you can verify yourself (but you never will, because you're a turd-flinging, retarded monkey). But after flailing about and failing to address those claims, you just drop it and move on to EVEN DUMBER ARGUMENTS. Being the retarded monkey that you are, you can't come up with reasonable answers on your own. 1) Satellites are more modern, so all those towers that were built before satellites became common served a purpose. 2) Satellites provide wide area coverage, but have limited bandwidth. 3) Satellites are expensive to launch, but a tower is relatively cheap to build. 4) Undersea cables provide lower latency and a higher bandwidth. In short, there's tradeoffs, and no one-size fits all solution. > Daddy government is here to do all your thinking for you. Unlike you, I can think for myself. You rely on flattard sites to do the thinking for you.