Seems like there would be error in the method of doing it that way. I think I agree with @Gumbatron on his reasoning, however, with your single study not providing more data, I wouldn’t say you’re technically wrong, but I’m sure the margin of error is huge. I’d just be careful going around saying stuff like this because if there is more data that comes out in the future and it shows that it isn’t 1 in 250 dying but 1 in 25,000 people are gonna reject your other shit instead of saying “oh, that’s a huge mortality rate from this drug. I shouldn’t take it.” Anyway, thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Gas the kikes on your way out.
Seems like there would be error in the method of doing it that way. I think I agree with @Gumbatron on his reasoning, however, with your single study not providing more data, I wouldn’t say you’re technically wrong, but I’m sure the margin of error is huge. I’d just be careful going around saying stuff like this because if there is more data that comes out in the future and it shows that it isn’t 1 in 250 dying but 1 in 25,000 people are gonna reject your other shit instead of saying “oh, that’s a huge mortality rate from this drug. I shouldn’t take it.” Anyway, thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Gas the kikes on your way out.
(post is archived)