So it's roughly 1 in 250 vaccinated Americans, not 1 in 250 Americans... the number would be over 2 million.
So it's roughly 1 in 250 vaccinated Americans, not 1 in 250 Americans... the number would be over 2 million.
How does a reaction equal a death here?
How does a reaction equal a death here?
Harvard got a $1 million grant to do this study, and when the group finished the results and contacted the CDC they were ghosted and didn't get anymore replies. On page 6 in Results it says
"Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. "
vaccine adverse events is part of the VAERS acronym, which includes death...
Harvard got a $1 million grant to do this study, and when the group finished the results and contacted the CDC they were ghosted and didn't get anymore replies. On page 6 in Results it says
"Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. "
vaccine adverse events is part of the VAERS acronym, which includes death...
https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
I think you'd need more information to draw that inference. 1% of adverse reactions may be recorded, but that doesn't break it down by severity. There are different levels of adverse reaction ranging from cold/flu like symptoms to temporary debilitating injury, permanent debilitating injury or death. The likelihood that all categories of adverse reaction are under reported at the same rate is very low. It's really a flaw of the study and should have been included. So, the actual rate of under reporting of vaccine deaths is likely not as bad as the less severe reactions. It's still almost certainly under 100%, but very likely to be much closer to 100% than to 1%.
Having said that, COVID is a fraud of monumental proportions and I will die before my child or I take the COVID death shot.
I think you'd need more information to draw that inference. 1% of adverse reactions may be recorded, but that doesn't break it down by severity. There are different levels of adverse reaction ranging from cold/flu like symptoms to temporary debilitating injury, permanent debilitating injury or death. The likelihood that all categories of adverse reaction are under reported at the same rate is very low. It's really a flaw of the study and should have been included. So, the actual rate of under reporting of vaccine deaths is likely not as bad as the less severe reactions. It's still almost certainly under 100%, but very likely to be much closer to 100% than to 1%.
Having said that, COVID is a fraud of monumental proportions and I will die before my child or I take the COVID death shot.
Problem is this is the only study that was done and the CDC ghosted the group when they tried to finish it
So it's "why do we have to guess" in the first place and why is the only study on earth looking into improving the surveillance of good/bad vaccines
Problem is this is the only study that was done and the CDC ghosted the group when they tried to finish it
So it's "why do we have to guess" in the first place and why is the only study on earth looking into improving the surveillance of good/bad vaccines
Project Officer: Steve Bernstein
It’s all so tiresome.
I’ll have to come back when I’m not on mobile. But if I’m understanding correctly. Only 1% of adverse effects are reported so you are extrapolating the other 99% proportionately?
>Project Officer: Steve Bernstein
It’s all so tiresome.
I’ll have to come back when I’m not on mobile. But if I’m understanding correctly. Only 1% of adverse effects are reported so you are extrapolating the other 99% proportionately?
Yep
Yep
Exactly, it doesn't.
Exactly, it doesn't.
You have a math issue. Europe is watching and counting deaths better than the US. They were at just under 4,000 deaths earlier, I did the math and at that time, the death rate was approx .0002%. I don't trust the US numbers as they are not actively counting the bad juju, but the US death count numbers are much lower. I've been vaccinated. My first ever flu vaccine. Don't get it, or get it. I don't give a fuck what you do. I chose to get it. No biggy if you don't.
You have a math issue. Europe is watching and counting deaths better than the US. They were at just under 4,000 deaths earlier, I did the math and at that time, the death rate was approx .0002%. I don't trust the US numbers as they are not actively counting the bad juju, but the US death count numbers are much lower. I've been vaccinated. My first ever flu vaccine. Don't get it, or get it. I don't give a fuck what you do. I chose to get it. No biggy if you don't.
I'm trying to follow your math. 1% serious reactions reported. 2400 dead from vax. 20% us vaxxed (300mil). So 2400 x 100 240000 serious reactions out of 60mil vax given. 1 in 250 has serious reaction. Is there a data point to use to understand amount of serious reactions that end in death?
I'm trying to follow your math. 1% serious reactions reported. 2400 dead from vax. 20% us vaxxed (300mil). So 2400 x 100 240000 serious reactions out of 60mil vax given. 1 in 250 has serious reaction. Is there a data point to use to understand amount of serious reactions that end in death?
Yeah the quote from the Harvard study (that was given a $1 million grant and the CDC ghosted the group after they tried to finish the study) is "Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. "
IDK why I used the phrase "severe reactions", they used "vaccine adverse events"
Yeah the quote from the Harvard study (that was given a $1 million grant and the CDC ghosted the group after they tried to finish the study) is "Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. "
IDK why I used the phrase "severe reactions", they used "vaccine adverse events"
Everyone I know that has gotten any vaccine was sick for at least one day directly from it.
Everyone I know that has gotten any vaccine was sick for at least one day directly from it.
Yes that's how it works.
Congratulations their immune system works.
Yes that's how it works.
Congratulations their immune system works.
Yeah, the immune system works, which is why it would have been much better to develop natural antibodies for a highly survivable virus rather than risk an experimental mRNA injection which is of little benefit to begin with.
Yeah, the immune system works, which is why it would have been much better to develop natural antibodies for a highly survivable virus rather than risk an experimental mRNA injection which is of little benefit to begin with.
Of the one that tested positive for COVID, they said the vaccine was worse than the disease O.O
Of the one that tested positive for COVID, they said the vaccine was worse than the disease O.O
But now they are double safe!
But now they are double safe!
When they keep vaccinating even though people die or have serious side effects you know its not about keeping people healthy. Especially when they had no problems shutting down the world and destroying people's lives over someone sneezing. But claimed they needed to do so for 15 days to stop the spread a year ago. You're being lied to.
When they keep vaccinating even though people die or have serious side effects you know its not about keeping people healthy. Especially when they had no problems shutting down the world and destroying people's lives over someone sneezing. But claimed they needed to do so for 15 days to stop the spread a year ago. You're being lied to.
its an attack and a crime against humanity
we are slave cattle to the criminal orchestrating this
no punishment is too severe for the devils involved.
its an attack and a crime against humanity
we are slave cattle to the criminal orchestrating this
no punishment is too severe for the devils involved.
Just because only 1% of severe reactions are reported doesn't mean only 1% of deaths are. Also because people understand that this thing is untested they might be quicker to report out of a sense of responsibility (the only way that if there is a problem that it will be stopped) vs thinking it's tested and if you personally had a problem it is likely unrelated.
Just because only 1% of severe reactions are reported doesn't mean only 1% of deaths are. Also because people understand that this thing is untested they might be quicker to report out of a sense of responsibility (the only way that if there is a problem that it will be stopped) vs thinking it's tested and if you personally had a problem it is likely unrelated.
um...
death is a severe reaction
um...
death is a severe reaction
But not all severe reactions are death.
But not all severe reactions are death.
What the fuck? I can’t even follow your logic. 1 in 250 people have not died of the vax.
What the fuck? I can’t even follow your logic. 1 in 250 people have not died of the vax.
(post is archived)