Thought occurred to me today about the term racism. I have argued that its a useless word and that everyone is racist when you apply it equally but its always a losing argument trying to get a judenslave to define anything. Then in a thought experiment i brought up the term 'tribalist' instead of racist and realised that while mostly synonomous the term tribalist applies far better to non-whites than whites.
A white person trying to defend themselves against the label 'racist' is a losing battle everytime, but using the term 'tribalist' its pretty clear that most whites arent tribalist people and are willing to work with anyone based on merit in most situations. blacks, juden, chinese, indians etc etc are all INCREDIBLY tribalistic though and always prefer their own to others. Bringing that argument into the ring and forcing your opponent to conflate the words 'racist' and 'tribalist' i think would be a winning strategy.
I know that, but we keep falling for the trick of trying to use language they own. Libs define the definition of racism and it's a fluid definition shapeshifting like their masters to fit whatever tactical need they want it to. Tribalist I believe has more to do with looking out for one's own tribe which doesn't sound bad while it's basically the same thing as racist.
For example: 'blacks shouldn't be so tribalistic and should try to work with other races more' would solicit numerous arguments from a judenslave about why it's justified. It's basically better branding for the old 'open borders for israel' thing. jews are extremely tribal, they should lower their guard and be more open to other things. 'Most jews refuse to breed with other races' etc Let judenslave make arguments for those things so they think it's their idea then use their same arguments for whites. Either it breaks the conditioning and frees their mind from anti tribal views of whites or it makes them stand against tribalism of other races.
(post is archived)