Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

264

A Race is the legacy of children you leave behind. Best to preserve is not the consistency of your childrens genes to their parents, but the prosperity and happiness of your descendants. This is consistent with the older definition of "race"

>Race

RACE, noun appears to only grudgingly agree, that Racial purity is decadent. Preserving biological race means you have no future, you cling to perceived golden days, you don't boldly look forward.

A Race is the legacy of children you leave behind. Best to preserve is not the consistency of your childrens genes to their parents, but the prosperity and happiness of your descendants. This is consistent with the *older* definition of "race" [From Websters dictionary 1828](http://www.webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Race) >>Race > >RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.] > >1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc. > >Hence the long race of Alban fathers come. Do you want to preserve your Race ? Miscegenation is not evil. Evil is not caring for your children and giving them a happy future. Please note also, the historian Spengler thought, and [Greg Johnson](https://www.counter-currents.com/2010/07/is-racial-purism-decadent/) appears to only grudgingly agree, that Racial purity is decadent. Preserving biological race means you have no future, you cling to perceived golden days, you don't boldly look forward.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 0 pt

What I meant to say is that you don't seem to be part of the newer ideological Identitarianism. Using the word "conservative" was probably wrong, I meant something closer to common sense.

[–] • 0 pt

I believe that people are of mixed race have problems identifying with either of the parent races, because that was my experience and I've seen it happen a lot in other people.

I am primarily white, Caucasian whatever you want to call it. However I've got slightly darker skin and several other traits that are clearly not European. I'm not complaining. I don't sun burn ever, my wife does I do not envy her on that one. My kids are all blond haired blue eyed kids that carry almost none of my native American traits and I'm okay with that. It'll serve them well they won't have to deal with the questions I did growing up.

There was a situation where I went to a high school that had redskins as a mascot, well an activist had a problem with it and so it had to be changed and because of my heritage apparently I needed to have a say and honestly I didn't care at all not even a little. I thought asking me was stupid. However I had to stand up and say something about it because I was part native American and my answer was its not offensive I don't care. I got ran out of the fucking school. So race mixing problem isn't the problem according to the left, ignoring race is.