Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

A Race is the legacy of children you leave behind. Best to preserve is not the consistency of your childrens genes to their parents, but the prosperity and happiness of your descendants. This is consistent with the older definition of "race"

>Race

RACE, noun appears to only grudgingly agree, that Racial purity is decadent. Preserving biological race means you have no future, you cling to perceived golden days, you don't boldly look forward.

A Race is the legacy of children you leave behind. Best to preserve is not the consistency of your childrens genes to their parents, but the prosperity and happiness of your descendants. This is consistent with the *older* definition of "race" [From Websters dictionary 1828](http://www.webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Race) >>Race > >RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.] > >1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc. > >Hence the long race of Alban fathers come. Do you want to preserve your Race ? Miscegenation is not evil. Evil is not caring for your children and giving them a happy future. Please note also, the historian Spengler thought, and [Greg Johnson](https://www.counter-currents.com/2010/07/is-racial-purism-decadent/) appears to only grudgingly agree, that Racial purity is decadent. Preserving biological race means you have no future, you cling to perceived golden days, you don't boldly look forward.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 0 pt

I think of race as a very extended family that is inbred to some degree. I can agree that a strong focus on racial purity can be rather silly. Though I do worry about race-mixed kids. They always feel like they have to choose a side. I suspect it has to do with the categories we have. We can't say mulatto or mestizo because people are unsure if these are offensive terms so these kids don't have a place to be.

[–] • 1 pt

I think I basically agree with this. There are definitely practical issues of mixing cultures and races. My argument really only applies to the concept of racial purity and keeping your race "pure"

[–] • 0 pt

I think it's foolish to be against race mixing as a rule. I am a fan of the British Empire and a human biodiversity hobbyist. I love reading about how the Anglo-Saxons are in terms of behavior and how they ruled a quarter of the world. Without mixing of the Angles and Saxons, the British Empire might never be.

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly. Eventually if people live together, and if they conquer or rule foreign countries, they will mix. That will eventually be the beginning of a new race that hasn't existed before. Mass immigration, however, as far as sociology is concerned, is similar to an invasion, and the present occupiers of the land have a right to refuse(as do all countries being invaded).