![Which way American man? [896x640 - 74KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/LMaF7R.jpg){kind=link}
They are both beholden to ZOG. They do not represent the best interests of the US population before the jew funded immigrant invasion. The guy on the right is the lesser of two evils, and might get us a four year break on enslavement to globalists.
I would much prefer a nationalist leader that's willing to cut off jewish/zionist influence, cut off Federal funding to any state (cough, California) that subsidizes illegal immigrants in any way, overfunds ICE to deport all illegal aliens, and prosecutes employers who hire them. They should also abolish or scale back all three letter agencies, and nationalize the currency, abolishing the "federal reserve".
We don't need a wall. We need to stop giving benefits to illegal aliens, prosecute the people who hire them, and take back ownership and control of our currency.
Based and actually accurate.
Unfortunately politics is a compromise between what you want and what everybody else wants and in this instance we have no Glorious Leader to light our way, what we need is a centrist '80s Democrat to regain power and then we can take it from there. The onus is on us if somebody can open the door, all other futures lead to our demise.
We must do what everybody else does... only more so. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
To see what we are up against please follow this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words
Fuck the kikes who have brought us to war again.
Ah yes, back when the Democrat Party was the Southern Man's Party. Too bad I'm too young to remember those times.
Nailed it... I think currency and government should be hard-separated just like religion and government is.
We don't need a wall. We need to stop giving benefits to illegal aliens, prosecute the people who hire them, and take back ownership and control of our currency.
Take away their reason for coming here and many fewer of them will come here. Some still will, but in much smaller numbers which can be easily managed.
I still say a wall along a border is smart, if it's part of a larger strategy to patrol the border and arrest invaders. There would be plenty of money for it if we weren't doling out billions to everyone who managed to get across.
We have a fiat currency controlled by the Rothschilds and other jews.
They can print as much money as they want. Politicians then spend it and deepen our debt, devaluing our currency. The only reason the US Dollar hasn't collapsed is because our military dominance forces countries to buy energy using our currency.
The way our Congress spends money is ridiculous and corrupt. It has nothing to do with the well being of people living in the US. It's about creating global hegemony for their jewish campaign financiers.
But you are correct, just the benefits and support costs of the illegal immigrants alone would more than finance a border wall. It's still an inefficient expenditure. The upkeep cost of the border wall would cover the entire enforcement cost of arresting employers who hire illegals and deporting the illegals. If you want it to be revenue neutral, heavily fine the employers in addition to jail time, and force the illegal immigrants into work camps until they pay back their net drain on our country.
(post is archived)