WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

816

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Now I'm no legal begal but,

How are they going to do that? It's just a pict. No words. I dont think intention can really be interpreted in court through this example.

A hacking charge or a loss of revenue from the intended advertiser may surely be pursued.

I could be wrong and never under estimate corruption.

[–] 7 pts

Remember that a capital cop can shoot and kill an unarmed woman climbing through a window and never even get outed, much less arrested and tried for murder.

[–] 2 pts

You mean the psyop that was fake as hell? You're really using that as an example?

[–] 0 pt

I thought his name was known.

[–] 1 pt

It's known on Poal and similar places but has never been released on MSM.

[–] 2 pts

LOL at still trusting the courts.

The honorable Judge Shekelbergstein enters the court

[–] 0 pt

Let the bidding for my ruling begin! /s

[–] 1 pt

They'll establish intention by bringing in 30 "experts" to show there is a "pattern of hate" the same way they tried to when "muh Russians hacked the election" and they sat in committees for days showing examples of the shittiest memes known to man to pretend like there was substance to the claim.

[–] 2 pts

Never underestimate corruption.

[–] 1 pt

They'll just do it.

Anyone who says it's a mistrial will be dismissed by the public as a conspiracy theorist.