> . It is just a means to an end, in my mind that end would be the acquisition of a significant amount of land. Well thats part of it. But more broadly. Why acquire *some* of the land, when you can take back *all* of the land? Our side has been doing retreat for so long we forgot the purpose of retreat. If you retreat, only use it to fortify yourself, and come back harder, to regroup, rest, and come up with a new strategy. From the amount of talk I see on here, twitter, gab, parler, and elsewhere, about "back to the land" plans, I assume again, our side is largely only thinking one step ahead (again). And that makes me conclude this message is actually being encouraged by the enemy. Why? Because the enemy already has a plan, is thinking two steps ahead, and intends to funnel us into something or other, to our great disadvantage, once again. "land is good", having a strategy is good, but what are we missing here. We should be thinking about the possible snares, and means this could be exploited, in order to head off those obstacles early.