You all joke and it sounds insane (even supposing it IS insane), but has anyone done a feasability study on actual human cloning? Because a clone, or even just a baby made from a regular egg and sperm made from pluripotent stem cells (which we can manufacture from things like skin cells), would make the ideal manchurian candidate. Why recruit, and raise hand selected individuals to be killers or politicians or other, when you can take your best examples (for whatever reasons, genetic, mental, etc), and recreate them in the flesh? Does anyone think thats an *unreasonable* position or priority for a global empire (banking) to pursue? If you had a trillion dollars to waste, or even a few billion, do you think it would be impossible, using todays technology to genetically alter an embryo or sperm cell to essentially 'clone' an individual? The tech is there. Take non-stem cells from a dead individual, lets say lee harvee oswald, shock them into pluripotent stem cells, condition them into sperm cells, and perform insemination or implantation. Of course obviously pete isn't a fucking clone. Thats not the point. Point is, that 'cloning' in this fashion is completely doable, today, with modern methods and techniques. The only question is, why *wouldn't* someone or organizations with a lot of fucking money and *very* long outlooks (50+ years)..why would they *not* at least consider this approach? I think it would be eminently 'reasonable' (from the perspective of international oligarchs), and more cost efficient and effective to breed people in labs for specific jobs, especially from genetic stock thats already been successfully used for killings or politics and other purposes. Wouldn't you agree if you were a megalomaniac?