Thats unnecessary..
according to liberals, so are ARs and AKs. so are pistols. who the fuck are you to say what is necessary?
It depends on the occassion. If im trying to smoke someone at a great distance, than yes, by all means. However, if im going to an event that is already labeled as a hate fueled event by the lying media, and patroled by over zealous cops, in a now democratic state, it is only going to bring more unwanted negative attention, thus distracting from the over all message. At that point, the attention is on the individual, not the mass group, and individuals can and will be singled out, harassed and used to prop up yet another lie. make sense?
"It's for self defense!"
Because nothing spells more self defense than an m82 shot from 1500 yards away
That being said, I guess it might very well just do the trick anyway if you violently drop it in the legs of your enemy lol
It is for self defence. Self defence against a corrupt state that would call the national guard on you because you dare to disagree with them.
Not very useful efficient against highwaymen and niggers though.
yeah, man, i am all for self defense, but a good defense is also not attracting unwanted attention. The guy looks like he's on his way to his first milsim or cosplay event, after playing call of duty for nine years straight.
Guns are for opposing tyrannical governments, NOT hunting, NOT target practice and NOT (only) self-defense.
Yeah
Not sure how that's going to work against MRLS, you'll still need a bigger dong in the end
(post is archived)