WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

132

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence.

People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused.

Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing.

Peace faggots

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence. People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused. Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing. Peace faggots

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

No. I mean Free Speech

No, you mean heavily censored and regulated speech but you're trying to pretend it is "free speech." That's a misnomer. You cannot have your cake and eat it, too. You either want the government to heavily regulate speech and restrict it or you want it unfettered and to truly be "free speech." Like I've explained.

Except it does because it's already legal precedent in the US.

It's legal precedent that porn is free speech. Why you're missing this EXTREMELY important point which utterly destroys YOUR point, I have no idea. It's such a weird and obstinate thing to try and argue.

No. I mean Free Speech which does not include (((porn))) (((propaganda))) or government pushed lies of control.

You mean heavily restricted speech. Got it. I understand. We agree that porn is poison. You just want to move the goalposts away from how to reduce the harm of this poison and make it about "legal precedence" which is such a bullshit topic anyway because none of that matters for the point of my question.

How are you going to implement this deep censorship?

"we'll" know it when we see it. That's porn.

Mkay. So what about people who get off on fully clothed people?

Your new censorship committee has now deemed fully clothed people as porn because a group of clothed enthusiasts started a website dedicated to fapping to certain styles and people (these already exists, by the way so I am not inventing something new). So now what? What are you doing about your censorship?

ALL PORNOGRAPHY is extremely harmful to minors.

ALL porn is harmful to ALL people. Everyone. I cannot think of a safe use of porn in any situation, ever. This is not just about kids, this is about all of humankind being harmed by this.

I will never get anywhere with you because you'll never provide any satisfactory answers, you'll never clarify anything I've brought up. You like to live in vague ideas that sound nice but you are not a person of solutions at all. My bad for thinking we could get anywhere in any sort of conversation with you. You're always like this.