Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

951

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence.

People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused.

Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing.

Peace faggots

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence. People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused. Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing. Peace faggots

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (90).
[–] • 1 pt

Not necessarily. How about a sexually suggestive pose with genitals untouched and not visible?

[–] • 0 pt

You mean like nearly every clothing and perfume ad? My opinion is that isn't porn unless you are thinking of something I can't fathom.

[–] • 0 pt

No, more suggestive than that. One definition might be "the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement" It does not necessarily need to involve genital stimulation, or even depict the genitals. It's more about the intent of causing sexual excitement.

[–] • 0 pt

Because I can't quite imagine the case what you are referring to, and I do not want to see it either, I will just say there may be a case of that somewhere. If it is intended to cause sexual excitement it is some sort of porn for sure. If it's questionable I'd say it is.