WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

833

Fuck New York in particular.

Fuck New York in particular.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Curious as to the 'safe limit' to where it will not cause sickness/ illness/ or problematic issues in A] Healthy individuals B] Immunocompromised/sick frail/ elderly or new born individuals C] Domestic livestock, Pets D] Wildlife, Plants and crops ??

It's somewhere around the safe limit to every other chemical pollutant we have in the environment for as long as we've been polluting the environment. Considering just how many evil, terrible and deadly substances we have put into our world, I think vinyl chloride decomposition products are not quite in the top 10 of that list. And this is not the first time vinyl chloride and it's breakdown products have been released into the environment in quantity so maybe that tells us something about it's safe limit and long term effects.

[–] 0 pt

' And this is not the first time vinyl chloride and it's breakdown products have been released into the environment in quantity so maybe that tells us something about it's safe limit and long term effects.'

I'm not sure if that is saying there were no sickness/ illness/ problematic issues or if it's suggesting there is 'just no evidence' ...

[–] 0 pt

I'm not sure if that is saying there were no sickness/ illness/ problematic issues or if it's suggesting there is 'just no evidence' ...

I'm saying that there are historical records that can be located and analyzed for reference on this subject. We don't need to speculate if we can look into the past and see the actual aftermath. Even though the chemical is different, we can even look to Bopal, India and the Union Carbide gas incident for answers to long term impact.

There are plenty of chemical related disasters we can use here but right now it's more popular to simply make speculation driven by various agendas than to break it down objectively. The jews want us to live in the post-truth world they created so thinking critically about this event is discouraged while emotionally reacting to it is encouraged. I'll stick to my critical thinking, healthy skepticism and my own research rather than play the jew games of (((optics))) and (((division))).

[–] 0 pt

I'll stick to my critical thinking, healthy skepticism and my own research rather than play the jew games of (((optics))) and (((division))).

Hence my query about the disconnect between their 'safe level' narrative and actual biological harm to an individual ...