![The estimated fallout zone from the train wreck in Ohio. [739x719 - 459KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/F9Yaev.png){kind=link}
I'll stick to my critical thinking, healthy skepticism and my own research rather than play the jew games of (((optics))) and (((division))).
Hence my query about the disconnect between their 'safe level' narrative and actual biological harm to an individual ...
> I'll stick to my critical thinking, healthy skepticism and my own research rather than play the jew games of (((optics))) and (((division))).
Hence my query about the disconnect between their 'safe level' narrative and actual biological harm to an individual ...
Hence my query about the disconnect between their 'safe level' narrative and actual biological harm to an individual ...
We'll never have an answer that everyone can agree on. That's why it's important to determine for yourself what you consider is safe.
>Hence my query about the disconnect between their 'safe level' narrative and actual biological harm to an individual ...
We'll never have an answer that everyone can agree on. That's why it's important to determine for yourself what *you* consider is safe.
That's why it's important to determine for yourself what you consider is safe.
Sure, implicit (blind) trust in 'official Government agencies and multi-national conglomerate derived safe levels' is to die for.
>That's why it's important to determine for yourself what you consider is safe.
Sure, implicit (blind) trust in 'official Government agencies and multi-national conglomerate derived safe levels' is to die for.
(post is archived)