Their data looks at 12-19 year olds and 80+. There seems to be a segment or two missing in between. There are also some fairly obvious flaws here, in terms of who is tested. Primarily, testing is focusing on symptomatic, and even mildly symptomatic "vaccinated" people may be reluctant to get tested as they (falsely) assume that they couldn't have COVID. There's also a distinction between "fully vaccinated" and "unvaccinated"... does the "unvaccinated" category include those who are "partially vaccinated", or are these people excluded. An honest approach would be to include them as a separate categories. This report is more interesting in terms of what it doesn't say than what it does.