WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

533

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

“In fact, these antibodies were even able to deactivate a virus engineered, on purpose, to be highly resistant to neutralization. This virus contained 20 mutations that are known to prevent SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from binding to it. Antibodies from people who were only vaccinated or who only had prior coronavirus infections were essentially useless against this mutant virus. But antibodies in people with the "hybrid immunity" could neutralize it.”

Wouldn’t that be considered the same kind of gain of function research that the government denies it was funding? Are the new “mutations” actually these engineered viruses “escaping “?

🤔🤔🤔

[–] 0 pt

I was hoping someone would point this out.

This is scary as fuck. Engineering viruses specifically to bypass immune responses?

Here's SARS-CoV-3.

Wouldn’t that be considered the same kind of gain of function research that the government denies it was funding?

Yes, as a matter of fact that is exactly what that fucking means.

Are the new “mutations” actually these engineered viruses “escaping “?

I don't think so and frankly I think the whole "variations" shit is all about covering for the deaths of fully gene therapied people due to Antibody Dependent Enhancement.

I was going to quote that but I wanted people to actually read the article instead of the headline.

the government fauci denies it was funding?