![In a nutshell... [628x682 - 46KB]](https://poal.co/static/images/FlHzQh.jpg){kind=link}
can you use the concept free market of free markets to argue against trespass of the commons? can you use free markets to logically argue what the lolberterians only have moralizing to argue for? im a few steps beyond what you even know can exist in lolbertarianism.
Can confirm what @UKD said. Economics in one lesson is a fantastic primer.
There is no tragedy of the commons in a libertarian society because all property is privately owned. There are no commons.
In contrast, with collectivist systems of government all property is said to be held in common by the state for the people.
so you have no answer to your once safe neighborhood going to shit or the pollution of our air and water. not to mention blackmail and sex with kids if they 'consent'
Forced integration is a government mandated program. Libertarians believe in freedom of association. That means you could move to a neighborhood that only allows the type of people you want to live with.
Pollution is a more nuanced answer, but I'd point out that pollution is often a problem of the commons - people pollute the common area because no one owns it. People take better care of their own property. States typically aren't good at protecting the environment. It's easy for a big corporation to bribe the state so they can pollute.
In a free society we'd kill the pedos.
(post is archived)