WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

Who would win?

Who would win?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Nuclear vs. All

The discussion around energy production should start and end with nuclear. The fact it is not used unbiquitously in the present age is absurd.

Niggers. What are niggers? Alex for 1000.

[–] 0 pt

Africa did Fukushima.

Being close to niggers rubs off. Japan let niggers in.

[–] 2 pts

But the nuclear plant doesn't kill birds, the environmental activists will never go for it.

[–] 2 pts

Of course it doesn't, birds aren't real.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

birds aren't real.

AT LAST, HE ADMITS IT!!!

[–] 1 pt

I've mentioned that many times.

[–] 1 pt

Birds are government drones. Libs are the good guys trying to save us from the government!

[–] 1 pt

Whichever is cheaper

[–] 2 pts

Nukeby far. Also provides middleclass jobs: trades, security, admin. Turbines only generate within specific speed ranges. The blades are not recyclable, birdstrikes, motors explode....

[–] 1 pt

well see those huge smoke stacks letting out all that pollution? See? Thats the problem with Nuclear! No such issues with wind farms! /s