Bart Sibrel, in his new book, says that not long before Armstrong died he (Sibrel) had a conversation with Armstrong wherein Sibrel pleaded with Armstrong to come clean (this was about the fourth conversation he'd had with Armstrong) about the alleged moon landings.

He said Armstrong conceded that what Sibrel had been saying for years about the landings being staged was correct and that he (Armstrong) had his own plan to reveal it all - don't know what that is but Sibrel said a lot was said in confidence and agreement not to say anything more than this.

Says he pleaded with Armstrong to 'save his soul' before death by repenting and telling the truth. It's amazing how much Armstrong is visibly shaken (AND shaking) when approached by Sibrel in the documentary "Astronauts Gone Wild." I don't need anything more than the reactions of these astronauts in that film to prove to me it was all fake. It is absolutely stunning and fascinating to watch their reactions.

And of course there are people here on Poal who will hate me for saying all this but it's time to face the truth.

Don't have the technology anymore = ran out of grainy film? Harder to pull that stunt now with everything being hi-def.

The "technology" was White educated Northern European male Nazis. They don't have Nazis anymore.

The reason people think that the moon landing was faked, is because everyone has forgotten what White men can do when they work together and are not held back by the lesser races.

Yes it's true that some problems need a massive amount of computing power to figure out. But those same problems can also be solved by the most intelligent White males, who after receiving worthwhile educations, collaborate together to find abstract workarounds to solve those same issues.

Start a GoFundMe to send a piece of shit to the moon. jews love anything to do with shit.

There are lots of things that were once commonly done by ancient peoples that we cannot do today because we lost the discrete knowledge that is separate from the primary knowledge of a task or subject. It's never the primary knowledge that gets lost and cannot be recreated. What does often get lost is the nuanced discrete knowledge that makes the primary knowledge applicable to the project. Let's take making vacuum tubes for example.

Most of the world that once produced vacuum tubes by the millions has lost the discrete knowledge to do it again. Despite there being plenty of primary knowledge about how it should all work to make tubes, the discrete knowledge that came from those who were actually making them every day is nearly completely gone. The glass blowers who have developed and honed their techniques to become industrialized and mechanized are almost all extinct. No one new took their place so all that knowledge is lost. Without just that one parcel of discrete knowledge, there is virtually no way to make vacuum tubes at industrial scales again.

Do you really think that the problem with recreating the moon missions is simply the lack of primary knowledge? Is a computer that is less powerful than a cheap home computer from the 80s is the problem here? No. The real problem is all the discrete knowledge about how to tweak the engineering and construction and operations of a vast array of equipment, processes and people are what is missing. It's the notes in the margin of the book that make the difference here. A fresh new copy of that book minus the margin notes is worthless because like a recipe, it is important to know the nuances rather than just the literal words. We lost the nuances and it makes the whole endeavor much harder to achieve again.

So unless you know how to make Greek Fire the exact way the ancient Greeks used to, then you must at least entertain the idea that there's more to the story than just simply losing some technology.

Meanwhile idiots think we are going on the 8 month rocket flight to Mars to live there. We don't even have a moon base to test out life off of Earth. People are fucking morons.