WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

L O L

L O L

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

if you think we landed on the moon six times in under four years all during nixon's administration using computer technology that has 1/100th of the processing power of your smartphone, you're not very much of a critical thinker.

[–] 1 pt

How much computing power do you figure is required, not discounting human brain power picking up some of the slack?

[–] 1 pt

tree black wimmenz shoulda bout manage it.

I believe that was the idea behind 'hidden figures', wasn't it?

[–] 1 pt

i've no idea how much is actually required since we've never successfully sent anyone to the moon and back. the point is simply an illustration of how far we've progressed technologically since 1969-1972, when all six manned moon landings allegedly occurred, and yet in 2022 we still can't even get a high resolution photograph of the alleged landing areas even with a mission that specifically sets out to do so (the L.R.O.).

[–] 0 pt

The logic is next tier retardation. Lol.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You can land on the moon without any computing power. The risk and fuel consumption goes up. Basic trig is all that's required. Basic computing power is more than enough. Their manual backup system is a sextant and window. The backup to that is the window.

Isn't it funny how uneducated judeo-no-moon-landers are always found to be.

[–] 0 pt

Just ordered Bart Sibrel's new book, should be here tomorrow.