Imagine if that was actually an argument made. You’re a fucking idiot.
I'm not convinced by the moon landing conspiracy theories, but whoever made this meme (or thinks it's cleaver or intelligent) has no idea what the argument even is.
Yeah it's a poor strawman that does nothing to convince anyone anything. It's weak on so many levels but worth a mild chuckle before it falls apart.
That's the joke. The judeo-no-moon-land propaganda has as much credibility as the meme presents.
No one says it was done with CGI. It was the same technology Stanley Kubrik used to make 2001: A Space Oddysey in 1968.
have you seen , the 2002 film about the CIA and Stanley Kubrik faking the landings?
Worst strawman ever.
White men own the moon. Historically, when you land on a new island or land mass that is deserted, you stick a flag in it, and it's yours. The flag is a claim of ownership. White men claimed the moon for the white race.
The moon was claimed by (((fellow white people )))
Not that I am siding with anything. This was technology in 1966-67 https://youtu.be/LbsxNwSOzRI
Would it not be kinda interesting if the moon landings are fake and the actually real story was 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and with this clown world who knows.
if you think we landed on the moon six times in under four years all during nixon's administration using computer technology that has 1/100th of the processing power of your smartphone, you're not very much of a critical thinker.
How much computing power do you figure is required, not discounting human brain power picking up some of the slack?
tree black wimmenz shoulda bout manage it.
I believe that was the idea behind 'hidden figures', wasn't it?
More like tree fiddy
i've no idea how much is actually required since we've never successfully sent anyone to the moon and back. the point is simply an illustration of how far we've progressed technologically since 1969-1972, when all six manned moon landings allegedly occurred, and yet in 2022 we still can't even get a high resolution photograph of the alleged landing areas even with a mission that specifically sets out to do so (the L.R.O.).
The logic is next tier retardation. Lol.
You can land on the moon without any computing power. The risk and fuel consumption goes up. Basic trig is all that's required. Basic computing power is more than enough. Their manual backup system is a sextant and window. The backup to that is the window.
Isn't it funny how uneducated judeo-no-moon-landers are always found to be.
Just ordered Bart Sibrel's new book, should be here tomorrow.
If you want to see how advanced computer graphics were in 1971 see THX 1138. George Lucas's first video nobody knew about.
I will warn you, the first half is so boring you'll nearly turn it off, especially if you're watching with others and you can't take responsibility for it's boringness. It starts to move right around the halfway mark. But the last 10 or 20 minutes light up.
Only absolute muppets believe the moon landing.
(post is archived)