Imagine giving your life for this... Thanks jews! [700x690 - 410KB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (21).

[–] • 1 pt

Ah, I see the misunderstandings now. I should have put echoes around judeo-christian. Several times on here I have spoken about the falsehood of that term and the undermining to the truth that this country was founded on Christian values it carries with it.

My original reply to the post says, “The results of judeo-christian values.” A) It literally very much is the result of (((judeo-christian))) values. B) I took for granted folks on here clearly understand my position on the false term since I have mentioned it several times. C) It should be obvious it is a result of the falsehoods behind the dirty jew term judeo-christian even without echoes. It may not be real, but it damn sure is a thing. A thing that needs to be ridiculed. Which is the whole point of my reply.

To his response of, “Not a thing + she isn't White. She's a sandkike”, I easily conceded to the she’s not white part. As to “not a thing”, I know that, you know that, he knows, but many don’t as it is pushed every fuk’n day by our politicians ad nausea. Hence my response of, “judeo-christian does indeed exist in enough politicians disinformation campaigns to make it very much “a thing” and a very dangerous thing at that.” Adding at the end to that, “Get what you’re saying though.” Shows I’m on board.

Nonetheless the lil’ fuk still has to jump my shit. To which I replied, “I know, I know. You’re a hammer that rides a high horse and everything is a fuk’n nail. So much so you miss the point of what many on here say and then you go about put’n retarded words in their mouths.” And I’m not wrong about that, I’ve seen him do it many, many times to people on here. Third time he’s done it to me I think. Personally I think it’s an abrasive, petty and belligerent way to respond to people, leaning heavily toward authoritarian which I don’t particularly care for, nor do well with. I got enough authorities leaning on my ass in life as it is. I don’t need more thank you. Wanna talk, fine. Let’s talk. Wanna hammer on me, you can piss right the fuk off.

Thank you for responding, I appreciate it. So there you go, other than that I got no issues with the guy. I agree with him much of the time, but I do try to avoid him for the very reasons stated above. We all got our quirks. I try my best to get along and be congenial to others on here and make way for the quirks. Lol, hope I cleared up my position here for you well enough.

Ah, I see the misunderstandings now. I should have put echoes around judeo-christian. Several times on here I have spoken about the falsehood of that term and the undermining to the truth that this country was founded on Christian values it carries with it. My original reply to the post says, “The results of judeo-christian values.” A) It literally very much is the result of (((judeo-christian))) values. B) I took for granted folks on here clearly understand my position on the false term since I have mentioned it several times. C) It should be obvious it is a result of the falsehoods behind the dirty jew term judeo-christian even without echoes. It may not be real, but it damn sure is a thing. A thing that needs to be ridiculed. Which is the whole point of my reply. To his response of, “Not a thing + she isn't White. She's a sandkike”, I easily conceded to the she’s not white part. As to “not a thing”, I know that, you know that, he knows, but many don’t as it is pushed every fuk’n day by our politicians ad nausea. Hence my response of, “judeo-christian does indeed exist in enough politicians disinformation campaigns to make it very much “a thing” and a very dangerous thing at that.” Adding at the end to that, “Get what you’re saying though.” Shows I’m on board. Nonetheless the lil’ fuk still has to jump my shit. To which I replied, “I know, I know. You’re a hammer that rides a high horse and everything is a fuk’n nail. So much so you miss the point of what many on here say and then you go about put’n retarded words in their mouths.” And I’m not wrong about that, I’ve seen him do it many, many times to people on here. Third time he’s done it to me I think. Personally I think it’s an abrasive, petty and belligerent way to respond to people, leaning heavily toward authoritarian which I don’t particularly care for, nor do well with. I got enough authorities leaning on my ass in life as it is. I don’t need more thank you. Wanna talk, fine. Let’s talk. Wanna hammer on me, you can piss right the fuk off. Thank you for responding, I appreciate it. So there you go, other than that I got no issues with the guy. I agree with him much of the time, but I do try to avoid him for the very reasons stated above. We all got our quirks. I try my best to get along and be congenial to others on here and make way for the quirks. Lol, hope I cleared up my position here for you well enough.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Understood, Thank you.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Thank you sir! Without having vocal inflections it really is sometimes difficult to grasp what someone writes. I get that. Lol, like there’s a couple vocal inflections one could use to say, “Well bless your heart” that will have two different tones and intents. Written, maybe a little harder to judge sometimes. Texts can be the worst! Lol, hence I guess the use of emojis after to give the proper inflection and understanding to the words used.

Anyway, hope you don’t think I was chastising you. Not at all. I merely saw it as an opportunity to correct something that needed correcting. By that I mean I kinda feel his style of response has a way of twisting things away from the original context and intent. We’re all good here and on the same team brother!

parent
link