WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 14 pts (edited )

They have no principles, only pretenses.

They will say anything to acquiring power. No two sentences have to reconcile, that's your problem to resolve. They will keep pushing while we all play muh logic defense

[–] 4 pts

i couldn't agree more. their opinions are worthless, but yet they have a massive impact on the national conversation thanks to the globalist cocksuckers that own media and big tech who essentially control said conversation.

they should be ignored and excluded from an honest debate, but that will never happen.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

thanks to the globalist cocksuckers that own media and big tech

theres the problem. Remove media and you remove the ability to manufacture scandals.

Remove media and you remove the ability to influence elections or intimidate representatives.

Remove media and you remove the ability for them to silence populist and nationalist movements.

Remove media and you remove their ability to demonize us.

The media IS THE enemy. The very heart of the vampire.

While the banks are the head of the vampire.

And the bureaucracies big tech, agencies, NGOs and universities are the tentacles.

[–] 2 pts

If I find myself debating a demoncrat/progressive/non-binary trans-dragonkin, then I've already lost. They crave attention and it's like arguing with a petulant child. The only way to win is to ignore them and shun them whenever possible.

[–] 1 pt

exactly. more often than not they have no interest in an honest debate.

i read a quote from a person who came up with a "litmus test" before engaging. he asked himself two questions 1) does this person seek to actually have a dialogue and is arguing in good faith? 2) does this person have the capacity to understand what I'm trying to say/explain?

if no on either then move along it's not worth your time.

[–] 1 pt

Commies just want your stuff.

The end

[–] 0 pt

You realize the tech oligarchs are indeed socialist, they live off the work of others.

[–] 7 pts

It has been popular to trash capitalism lately because of "mah greedy corporations" but the real essence of it all lies in who owns the means of production. The only options are Goverment, Large International Corporations or Small Businesses. Everything functions better when the bulk of the capital is in the hands of small business owners.

[–] 3 pts

IIRC, eighty percent of Americans were basically self employed up until WWII. I think that number dropped earlier during the (((Great Depression))). Also IIRC correctly, originally corporations were only granted thirty year charters to ward off the creation of monopolies in the early years of these United States.

[–] 0 pt

Corporatism is a form of socialism

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

So they want the workers to seize the means of production…but the moment they do, they become evil capitalists?

Does anyone else see a problem here?

[–] 1 pt

Not the hopeful oligarchs pushing for "communism" to create the societal shift that will enrich a few of them at the expense of the entire middle class

[–] 3 pts

When communists say "workers own the means of production to prevent capitalists from exploiting them" they mean the government owns the means of production and exploits the workers for their own good. So instead of being able to threaten you with your job, your employer can also threaten you with prison, loss of your home, and even death. It's liberation from the chains of capitalism.

[–] 2 pts

Getting a promotion in ussr was possible by selling your daughter as a sex slave to your boss.

Liberated from capitalism.

[–] 0 pt

Also while being significantly less efficient and much more corrupt

[–] 3 pts

they spend all that money to do business and the government says "well we decided food is not a human need any more". democrat shitholes will be the first places to be destroyed, they will use it as a pretext for military intervention

[–] 3 pts

They will never tell us the real death tolls, either.

[–] 3 pts

Small business owners are some of the hardest workers out there. What an idiot statement.

As far as the capital. Yes that is a lot of capital. Capital that hard working small business owners risk by being operation. Many times it is capital that is borrowed from a bank.

[–] 2 pts

I'll take "Who are the Kulaks?" for $800, Alex

[–] 1 pt

WORKERS UNITE! ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE! (as long as they unite with the liberal hive mind and accept government domination)

THEY BORROW MONEY, YOU DUMB COMMIES.