![Gen X Didnt Have This Problem [509x540 - 45KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/VaOdp0.jpg){kind=link}
Kids can see psychologists at school and get prescriptions without their parents' knowledge or consent. Thanks Democrats.
Name one instance of a shooting in which meds were obtained this way. These parents willingly gave their kids these meds.
That's not how rational debate works. The way it works is the party making the claim supports the claim. You claim that mass shooters are on drugs, therefore their parents willingly supplied them. I pointed out that your argument is a non-sequitur. That means you have to support your argument with additional data. Show us the data confirming that mass shooters are taking drugs with their parents knowledge and consent.
No, you provided an anecdotal response with no supporting evidence at all, and continue to fail to explain your claim that these children are all getting their meds without the knowledge of their parents.
It is not a non sequitur to assume parents tend to provide their kids medication. In fact, it is stupid to suggest otherwise without any attempt at corroboration at all.
You don't get to come in here blasting out completely unfounded claims then demand that the response includes context and evidence you yourself failed to provide.
So support your initial claim, or tuck the tail and fuck off.
(post is archived)