WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K
https://pic8.co/sh/OhMfHD.jpg

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Don't be so quick to throw those two into the same basket.

Chemtrail theorists were able to prove that there is a much higher concentration of aluminum oxide in the soil beneath regular "contrail" sightings.

They took the evidence to court and forced the airlines to "admit" that they add aluminum to jet fuel to make it more efficient.

Aluminum has been shown in lab studies to cause brain damage.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

kys Jet planes do not use fuel like you think they do.
Literal tons of fuel in the wings? Sorry.

[–] 0 pt

They took the evidence to court and forced the airlines to "admit" that they add aluminum to jet fuel to make it more efficient.

Please back that up. Aluminum would destroy engines. It requires extremely high temps to burn. Technically could increase exhaust density but that would require such a high degree of content the turbine would die in short order. Any form of powered aluminum would act as an abrasive.

[–] 1 pt

Nah. It's a waste of my time to go digging for proof in an environment of censorship, especially when those who don't already know will write it off anyway.

It's a thread you can pull on if you choose. The evidence will likely be hard to find and you will likely have to search for related evidence like aluminum oxide soil contamination rather than evidence of chemtrails.

In the end the skeptics will always say "it's not this kind of aluminum that's dangerous" "it's just industrial waste like every other buisness" "it has nothing to do with chemtrails" "it's not intentional" "the concentration is to small to matter" etc etc etc.

My point is simply that the chemtrail theory has far more plausibility than flat earth. It probably is some truth buried under miles of fake conspiracy to hide the truth.

Operation sea foam is declassified proof that the government is willing and able to do these kinds of things and get away with them.

https://www.chemworld.com/Liquid-Aluminum-Sulfate-p/4820pol.htm

https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5003186.PN.&OS=PN/5003186&RS=PN/5003186

https://uhmreactiondynamics.org/ONR.html

Just a few links with some info. The last is from the university of Hawaii. Didn't find anything about a lawsuit.

Many metals can be brought to a solution, from aluminum to gold.

[–] 0 pt

Which has nothing to do with the question. Metals in suspension is common.