I agree. I don't like either of them.. meaning Trump and Biden.
Put it this way. You're in charge of protecting your family and you know guys are coming to murder everyone and loot your home.
You can only make one call to either Trump or Biden for help. The answer is obvious. Trump would let you down and maybe try to help, Biden wouldn't even understand you and hang up after gibberish (if he even knew how to answer at the moment).
Always pick the greater of two evils when only two evils are the option.
You can only make one call to either Trump or Biden for help.
Trump is the slow path to accelerationism, which gives the u.s. government time to adapt and possibly survive.
Voting isn't real, and so I will refrain from voting.
I hope whoever gets in causes civil war or starts ww3. This is a very extreme position--it is. But it wouldn't be incorrect to assume nothing will ever get better, and no one will have a future, until DC and NYC are laid to waste in a major war, external, or a civil collapse, internal.
They must be pushed, in every measure, as hard, and fast, and deliberately as possible, toward this outcome. The complete destruction or delegitimization and destabilization of the u.s. federal government and its periphery, preferably through lawful means.
The u.s. cannot be saved from the congress or executive or the intelligence agencies and the banks and wallstreet. America can't be saved. But we can rebuild after it burns.
And it is our job and duty to see it happen, to make it happen, by polarizing, pushing, prodding, and tricking, hook or crook, the u.s. government into starting its own funeral pyre.
Otherwise theres no hope of reform, no future for anyone, not american families, and not the american constitution. Nothing will change until these events come to pass.
If they are given time to adapt, congress and the special interests will assure, with time, that the complete lack of a voice we have, the complete illusion of choice, will become permanent and entrenched.
They are criminals and domestic enemies, and I do not acknowledge them as a legitimate government.
We need a complete redo. A full restart.
and because there is no legitimate way to fix things, the only other solution is to tear it down till they're on their knees begging. Once thats done, then we'll have the opportunity to fix things, without a billion dollar spy complex running mass informant networks to blackmail public officials, shutting down any real officials we get into office, or breaking up any organic movements or co-opting real parties like happened with the tea party.
They made their bed.
I agree with basically everything you said. We do need a restart and that's what I meant. The left digress and promote multiculturalism and anti White ideals. The right do accelerate and are pro jew like the left as well which is deplorable but they cancel each other out there. The right is the better of two evils until we get a full restart.
The right is the better of two evils until we get a full restart.
Negative, voting for evil is still voting for evil.
Third party does two things
forces the parties to infight
splits the vote and therefore accelerates the process of delegitimization of the regime two-party front. It does this by making them look ineffective and disorganized.
We can get there quicker by supporting third parties.
It breaks the national left-right-left-right (party) lockstep program.
I know you want to hold onto the belief in hope. But if you want there to be hope, if you want a real chance at fixing things, you have to stop voting for the parties killing hope.
Their legitimacy is limited to our participation in the two parties.
Our participation should be limited to any tactic or third party that messes up that process.
More generally, I advice you not merely to vote for a third party, but to start your own. Yes really. This gives you an assurance that the party is not co-opted.
Voting is an illusion, but the public doesn't know that, so by offering them alternatives, you undermine the very system. This is the trend that needs to happen, as many non-mainstream parties form as possible, salami-slicing away control first at the local level, like termites eating away at the foundation.
Many of these will be bought, threatened, or simply co-opted and infiltrated, but as long as lots of these parties form, enough will exist that the regime won't be able to go after all of them.
And because politics attracts the most self-aggrandizing, even in third parties, eventually the cunning among them will realize they have a common enemy and start to form coalitions against the dominate parties.
This puts the party system under tension, which means they'll have to be more public in their cooperation to be effective. In order to do this without alienating their bases they will begin a program of civic nationalism (probably not in name though), and depolarization.
At this point we will have to massively ramp up dissent, and push hyperpolarization on the public, so the civic nationalist trend fails, leading to a large scale spike in widespread and extreme alienation against the federal parties.
The key thing here is the political (nonviolent) equivalent to the strategy of tension. Only instead of the government pushing it on us, we manufacture the political circumstances (a groundswell of numerous new third parties), that push it on the government, so congress and the intelligence agencies are forced to make moves, publicly, that lead to the final dissolution of public trust or cooperation.
At that point the dissolution and balkanization of the u.s. is guaranteed, baked in, and seeded into the social fabric.
From there it will be a matter of reconsolidating key regions into an effective force, namely the blue ridge and appalachians, and using that as a wedge to prevent DC itself from being able to reconsolidate, until at which time the regime fails out right, and is absorbed. Only then can the u.s. be brought back together, under a weaker convention then federalism.
(post is archived)