It is better to be divided, and against zionist control, than to be united under zionist control.
One front makes it easy for them to infiltrate.
A thousand fronts makes it harder, while increasing the eugenic effect of inter-tribal conflict.
Either the 20,000 variants of christianity must be militarized and balkanized into islamic-tier aggression against each other, or a thousand flavors of aggressive paganism must be cult-like allowed and encouraged to flourish.
Bullshit, you think 20,000 pagan tribes would assault jews without Jews tricking them into fighting eachother? We need unison and perhaps there is no single faith that could unite us, perhaps Christianity isn't the banner but I'd back Christians against jews before backing pagans against Christians, pagan larpers are needlessly antagonistic against Christians and eat up all the anti Christian juden propaganda bullshit they can gobble up.
Last off I'll say that jews have been promoting 'paganism' while putting down Christianity, they see more value in promoting anti Christian faiths than promoting Christianity. Geez I wonder why that is?
Bullshit, you think 20,000 pagan tribes would assault jews without Jews tricking them into fighting eachother?
No, they would definitely fight each other, but I'm also confident that the eugenic effect of this, and the removal of political orthodox ("thou shalt not name them.", and "hitler = satan"), by the abandonment of the christians/jew paradigm, would eventually lead to the sort of discussion that results in unification against judaism.
pagan larpers are needlessly antagonistic against Christians
Same as muslims, but thats just it isn't it? The macrofactor that determines survival here, isn't necessarily unification. It's generalized aggression levels across a demographic. If you have another way of increasing aggression and in-group preferences, I'm willing to hear you out.
and eat up all the anti Christian juden propaganda bullshit they can gobble up.
They very much do. This just means that demographic will be more open to paganized christianity, e.x. east orthodoxy or catholicism, the originators. It's why we're seeing the likes of nick fuentes astroturfing to generation z. Protestantism is out of fashion with them. They see the moral and spiritual decay of western mankind, even if not cogent and actively aware of it, and know at least that something is wrong with modern society, even if they can't articulate it.
The biggest problem I see is that paganism has two fronts: the atheistic thrust standing contra to religion with christianity as the big bad, completely mindless, versus the alienated-as-the-new-faithful, those of whom found modernized religion lacking and went seeking the new in the old. Problem with that isn't that everyone has their own personalized version of Odin et al, it's that much of a faith is its community, its extended family, clan structure, and so on. With the obliteration of extended families as a typical organizing force, conversion to the atomic family, and the decay even of the atomic family, paganism is just a more generalized version of MGTOW / radical individualism. It's not that paganism doesn't have its possibilities, it's that theres definitive organizing and shaping that needs to be done to turn it into an active force or prin ciple.
Meanwhile the problem with christianity is its advanced decomposition as a zeitgist. Most of what it generates today that is worthwhile, is effectively neutralized by first labeling as "cults", demonizing leadership, and then having justified action post-facto, summarily crushed by authorities, without due process. So they already have an effective playbook against splinter groups. That leaves subversion of big branches, or even failing smaller branches of protestantism, which is a possibility for sure, and has some history going back a century, but I digress.
There are no easy answers here, only possibilities and opportunities.
(post is archived)