This is slightly incorrect. It's not "AIDS" as we know it, the syndrome caused by HIV infection (and likely a combination of several other factors, but let's just keep it simple and say HIV alone leads to AIDS); it's sort of a new form of immune system dysfunction.

From what I've read, the first shot increases antibody production in younger age groups by like 20-50%, but after a few weeks, that drops down to around 10-20%- this is why the booster is required. The second shot bumps up that antibody production to like 30%. But after a few weeks, you're back down to baseline antibody production... or possibly a little under 100%.

If this trend continues, and there's no reason to see why it wouldn't, then a person who took this shit will need regular "boosters" in order to keep their immune system at normal efficiency. Without boosters, their antibody production might drop to 70% in a year or so. That may not seem significant, but that could be the difference between "A minor cold that comes and goes in 12 hours" and "a cold that floors you for two weeks".

Also, interestingly, the data on older age groups shows no increase in antibody production after any of the shots/boosters... as a matter of fact, the first shot DECREASES their antibody production by around 15% on average, based on the study I had read. So there is literally zero benefit, actually a net NEGATIVE for older people to get the shot.

So it's sort of AIDS. A new form of AIDS. I've seen the term "CovAIDS" used to describe this, which fits well. Also "HIVaccine".

Pool’s closed for VAIDS.