"user was banned for this post" [1080x772 - 1.23MB]

[–] • 3 pts

V.A.I.Ds

link

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts

[–] • 1 pt

Someone explain to me why I’m seeing all these memes about the vaccine and AIDS. What did I miss

link

[–] • 2 pts

AIDS = acquired immunodeficiency syndrome Anything that crushes your immune system gives you acquired immunodeficiency syndrome . It does not need to be the Gay Plague.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Ah I see, makes sense now

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

the not-a-vax was made using HIV proteins and everyone has covaids

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Lolawlz

link

[–] • 0 pt

I'm 96% sure he never said that a vaccine is 100% effective.

link

[+] [deleted] • 4 pts

[–] • 0 pt

I think it's a big difference. A statement like "the vaccine is 100% effective" is just false but "the vaccine protects almost 100% for severe disease" seems reasonable, even though I don't like the "almost 100%", because of the ambiguity. It's clear that there is no consent about what still counts as almost 100%.

parent
link

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts

[–] • 3 pts

Hot damn your NPC flair is spot on (pic8.co)

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Trust the science and their ambiguity. 100% is not a definitive term anymore.

The only true 100% is that shekels were made at historical numbers at record rates.

So much so you have the bitch from cali and buffett pushing a law that elected officials cannot trade stock....fuck like they do anyway, their s.o. or some close makes the trade and they profit.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 0 pt

so it is %100 effective with respect to its intent

link

[–] • 0 pt

It's AIDS LOL

link

(post is archived)