WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

"Of the 150 glaciers in Glacier National Park in 1850, only 25 remain. Eleven of the park's iconic named glaciers have melted away since 1966."

There are way too many morons on Poal, just saying.

Don't think that having "freedom of speech" means that when you post something it might be true, or it's an alternative viewpoint, or Trump told you it was fact, or that by automatically saying the direct opposite to liberals makes sense because geophysics is political, or that the NWO lizard people are concealing the truth from patriots...

Because most of the time it's just utter fucking bollocks, you know fuck all about jack shit, and you are a fucking moron. You only get to drift along in your stupid bubble world because you have a forum full of other fucking morons to agree with you and you imagine that any of that is real.

Sure, you found 10 actual scientists on bitchute to agree with you, because that's how science works, theories exist only until someone proves them wrong, and climate models are complex because a lot of things are going on all at the same time and we need supercomputers just to tell if it's going to rain tomorrow. But dumbfuckery like this is annoyingly unhelpful because it's you disagreeing with millions of other much cleverer people, just because you want a different reality to be true

[–] 2 pts

So you are saying that in winter of 1932 there was more snow than in the summer of 2020? Fascinating.

[–] 0 pt

So you are saying

'If you could read, you'd be very upset'

[–] 0 pt

well the definition of glacier is there's ice there year around. I don't know when these pics were taken.

[–] 0 pt

retards believe global warming is real. there's still as much ice as ever before just not in the same places. they melt in part of the world and form in another. perfect example is iceland and greenland. when these places were named it was accurate now greenland is nothing but ice and iceland is green lol. earth just has seasons.

[–] 0 pt

What??? We are all going to die if the earth changes .4 C arriving to the climate alarmists! They must be right !!

(Meanwhile in some parts of the country it goes from 32 in the winter to 130 in the summer)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Don't commit the fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. There are also less pirates sailing the seas today. Was that also caused by global warming? Gonna need better evidence than a followed b.

[–] 0 pt

There are also less pirates sailing the seas today

have you counted them? There might be more off the coast of Somalia.

My post was in relation to the OP's statement that none of the glaciers would be gone, as I just proved, 125 glaciers have gone. Ergo, OP is a moron

Glaciers only reduce in size when there is either less snowfall or temperatures increase. We happen to know that both are occurring. What causes global temperature to increase? You leaving the central heating on and a global increase in CO2. It's a pretty simple relationship.

[–] 0 pt

A slight change in albedo could easily melt glaciers over a century timeframe, just to name one possible mechanism that isn't related to global warming.

[–] 1 pt

Found the global warming cultist. The earth is cooling asshole. We're heading into a grand solar minimum. CO2 does not have a meaningful impact on the climate at such tiny concentrations in our atmosphere.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The earth is cooling asshole

It may well be cooling in some future period, but right now it's warming, and it's warming because CO2 is increasing. As soon as you come up with a plan to alter that increase in CO2, then it might cool, until then it's not.

the only cult are the few hundred people in here that can't read a graph

CO2 does not have a meaningful impact on the climate at such tiny concentrations in our atmosphere.

congrats on skipping school 99% of the atmosphere is oxygen and nitrogen, neither of which absorb IR from the earth,. that remaining 0.04% of CO2 and 0-4% water vapour however, does. Critically, CO2 floats higher than clouds and covers the parts that clouds don't, this is why it's way more significant. This is also why you can precisely correlate changes in temperature and CO2 going back millions of years, with zero knowledge of cloud cover during that time, because it's not that critical, the level of CO2 is. Higher temperatures also warm the oceans, which means more water vapour, so that's a future tipping point too, but we can't easily stop cloud formation so nobody is planning on waving a towel in the air.

These are just simple measurable facts, temperature has precisely tracked cyclical CO2 levels throughout earth's history, the only thing that is increasing CO2 beyond this natural cycle is man's global industrialisation that creates more CO2.

Change to industries that produce less CO2, or let nature handle this as before by switching land back to trees and let them absorb the CO2. The only thing upsetting this cyclical balance is man. We fucked this up.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

What are your thoughts on information such as this: https://files.catbox.moe/nbkf98.jpg

Edit: Here is the source from that picture(Large pdf 100+MB): https://files.catbox.moe/48iu10.pdf [Evidence-Based Climate Science. Data Opposing CO2 Emissions as the Primary Source of Global Warming; Author(s): Don Easterbrook]

I took this information from this site: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/01/14/nearly-140-scientific-papers-detail-the-minuscule-effect-co2-has-on-earths-temperature/

Who is right, and who is lying?